"Heretic, Rebel, a Thing to Flout"

An Eclectic Journal of Opinion, Poetry, and General Bloviating


Dem Senator, Governor Candidates to Debate at Rockford Event
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin

Democratic voters in northern Illinois will have a rare opportunity to see the major candidates for Governor and U.S. Senator in the February primary.  The Northern Illinois Coordinated Campaign Committee (NICCC) will present debates by candidates in both races in Rockford on Sunday, November 15. 

Governor Pat Quinn and challenger Comptroller Dan Hynes will face off at 3:45 PM at the Radisson Hotel, 200 S. Bell School Road, Rockford.  After a buffet dinner at 5 PM, Senatorial candidates Treasurer Alexi Giannoulias, David Hoffman, and Cheryle Jackson will take the stage.

The NICCC is made up of the Democratic Parties of McHenry, Boon, DeKalb, Ogle, and Winnebago Counties.

Tickets for the debates and dinner are $25 or $200 for a table for eight.  Individual tickets will be available at the door.  Tickets and tables can also be reserved with a check made out to the NICCC, P.O. Box 785, DeKalb, IL 60115.   Call 815 756-9103 for further information.
 


Contrasting Worldviews—Carolyn Quinn Guest Blogger
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin

 

Carolynne Quinn



 

Carolyn Quinn (nor relation to the governor) attended two events this week that I would have loved to attend, but had to work instead.  Work is the curse of the activist class.  I have made the trip to Springfield several times and would have loved to hear the scuttlebutt about how next year’s races are shaping up.  But more important would have been the chance to stand up for Healthcare Reform right here in Crystal Lake.  That event was organized by a local outfit stitched together from local Tea Baggers, Minuteman anti-immigration zealots, and paranoid gun worshipers.  In McHenry County that makes them as respectable as the Bishop’s wife.  The Northwest Herald, an editorial opponent virtually any reform breathlessly covered the event.  So did conservative blogger Cal Skinner who had been promoting the event.

This week I attended 2 events, both held in the bubble of their own opposite ends of the political spectrum. The Democrats held their annual Governor’s Day rally at the Illinois State Fair in Springfield. Lots of rah-rah, go Democrats stuff. The Patriots United group held an event they billed to the media as a town hall meeting in Crystal Lake but denied to attendees that it was any such thing. “This is the regular monthly meeting of a private entity,” according to a woman who sold me a ticket. The moderator of the event announced that that they were nonpartisan. According to their website they are purely libertarian. Nonpartisan my eye.


Here is my take on the two.

 

Gov. Pat Quinn

Gov. Pat Quinn: “When [JFK] said, 'A rising tide lifts all boats, notice he did not say a rising tide lifts all yachts”


Iowa Gov. Chet Culver, Keynote Speaker at the Illinois Democratic County Chairmen’s Association (IDCCA) brunch before the Fair rally: “We believe in public policy solutions. While they are the party of 'Nope' - we are the party of ‘Hope.’”


Congressman Manzullo consulting with insurance lobbyist Ryan Brauns. The platform principles of Patriots United an allegedly “nonpartisan” group were in plain view. I approve of the transparency-just not the principles...

Cong. Don Manzullo (R-IL16): “This 1000+ page of legislation is designed to put private insurance companies out of business and drive medical doctors into other professions.”

Crystal Lake Mayor Aaron Shepley and a vice president of Centegra Health System, McHenry County’s near monopoly hospital system: "Speaking as a former lawyer, the proposed bill is purposefully vague - which is legalspeak for 'We can do whatever we want.'" "What's primarily wrong with the [healthcare reform] bill is that it doesn't address tort reform; not one word about tort reform in the document.”


Gov. Pat Quinn: "The stronger our people, the stronger our state. What the people need to be stronger right now is jobs."


Gov. Chet Culver: “On the first day of drivers' ed. you learned that if you want to go backward you put it in ‘R’ and if you want to go forward you put it in ‘D.’”

Cong. Don Manzullo: “The number of MDs who have been driven out of business because they cannot afford to pay for malpractice insurance is outrageous. The should not have to fear losing everything in the blink of an eye.”


Mayor Aaron Shepley: “Medicare does not pay very much relative to the cost of hospitals' expense. What makes people think they should get to have a baby for a $10 co-pay?”


Ok. Here are my questions to these politicians:


To Gov Quinn: You hit the nail on the head in terms of what I need to be stronger right now is a job. While I see progress toward new jobs in construction, green job training and car sales, I don't see so much progress for most people in my generation which represents the biggest chunk of the population. We are too young to retire and too old to start a new training from scratch. What do you propose to help us?


To Gov Culver: Great job helping the people of Iowa to learn how to move their politics Forward into Drive. Loved your rousing speech. But can I see the map of where we are going with all this hope and drive with a capital D? Is our president the only one with a map?


To Cong Manzullo: Good thing small business has you on their side. Good thing you don't want to see doctors, insurance companies and pharmaceuticals driven out of business. What about workers like myself who barely make enough money to pay bills and are in the same boat of not being able to afford insurance? Are you okay with it that people like me should have to fear losing everything in the blink of an eye? Are you okay with millions of people whose business is their home being driven out of that business?


To Mayor Shepley: Great to know my mayor is not intimidated by a legal document / proposed legislation. I like to see how you printed it on both sides of the page and organized it into a binder. Less waste of paper and energy to make that paper. No need to be overwhelmed by words just because there's a lot of them. As a teacher, I’m with you on that. My kids could read a thousand page book in 6th grade. Happily. And they don’t get paid $500/hour to do it…

So, since you don't approve of people getting Medicare because it costs the hospitals too much, and you don't approve of Medicaid because poor people are basically welfare queens or illegal immigrants who ‘don’t deserve” it: Will the city of Crystal Lake now provide healthcare to people who need strep throat tests, mammograms, measles vaccinations, TB tests, swine flu vaccinations or other needed treatment? It would be good to tell my neighbors who lost everything including their job, their insurance and their house - all in the blink of an eye - that the mayor of Crystal Lake has a plan to take care of them so they won't overburden the hospitals or the taxpayers.

 

 


My E-mail to Roland Burris
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin


Senator Burris—

You probably don’t remember me.  We have met three or four times at political events. I believe Paul Simon introduced us the first time. About three years ago we even had a nice conversation at Governor’s Day at the State Fair.  I am an active Democrat, currently Secretary of the McHenry County Party, and was proud to support your previous state-wide campaigns.  

I was critical of the way you came into office in the Senate, but I have never been a "Burris hater."

And I had every confidence that on the most critical issue you will face in your brief Senate career that I, and the people of Illinois, could count on you to stand fearlessly with our President and with Senator Durbin for strong, comprehensive health care reform that includes a public option.  I felt so confident that I did not pester you with e-mails, phone calls and letters as I have other officials.

Now, to my great disappointment, it seems I may be wrong.

I was astonished to find your name among the Freshman Democrats rallying to the side of Senator Baucus and his obstructionism in the Senate Finance Committee.  Baucus claims to be working with Republicans on a "compromise." But the Republicans are not interested in compromise, only in killing reform. Instead Baucus, heavily in debt to lavish support from the insurance industry, has made it clear that he wants to hold out against a public option in favor of some smoke and mirrors  illusion that will preserve insurance profits while cheating the American people out of the best—and most affordable—option available.

I am ashamed of you.  For the sake of the legacy you seem to treasure, redeem your reputation by withdrawing your support from this stab-in-the-back and forthrightly state your full support for real healthcare reform.

Patrick Murfin

 


Madigan’s Demur Sets Up Illinois Scramble
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin

Folks here in Illinois are still shaking their heads over the announcement by popular Attorney General Lisa Madigan that she will not be running for Governor or Senate.  She was the dam behind which a river of ambitious Democrats were contained.  They all hoped that she would open the floodgates to advancement by declaring for higher office.  Boy, were they disappointed.

 

Most observers were convinced until recently that Madigan would follow the fondest dreams of her father, Speaker of the House and Illinois Democratic Party Chair Michael Madigan and run for governor.  Meanwhile she was the open choice of the White House and Rahm Emanuel to make the run for Barack Obama’s old Senate seat against terminally damaged Blagojevich appointee Roland Burris.

 

Instead the diminutive and youthful Madigan announced that she would “stay in the job I love” and run for a third term.  The mother of two small children ages 1 and 4, her claim of family commitments have plausibility.  And she is certainly young enough to have chances for advancement in the future.  Likely those chances looked better to her than the murky waters she faced in the wake of scandal and budget melt down that have tainted the prospects of Illinois Democrats despite an ever widening advantage in voter registration, a wildly popular home town hero as President, and the perennial shoot-themselves-in-the-foot mopery of state Republicans.

 

Whether it was secret polling or shrewd political instincts, Madigan opted for safety.  Here is a score card of some of the players scrambling for position in the wake of Madigan’s decision.

 

For Senate:

 

Roland Burris was on everybody’s short list as an immediate lame duck—make that dead duck—unable to wash off the stench of his appointment.  Indeed a continual water-torture drip of new revelations indicate that the Freshman Senator was even less forthcoming about his solicitation of the former disgraced governor and his top aids than previously disclosed.  But Burris is a proud—some say arrogant—man.  Despite hints that he would be satisfied with a “career toper” appointment, he had indicated that he may run for re-election.  But today reports are circulating that he will announce Friday that he is out of the race but will finish his term.  He doesn’t have any money and likely can’t raise much.  But if a Democratic Primary field had gotten crowed and he could paint attempts to oust him as racial, he might have squeaked by on the basis of big turn outs by African Americans.  He would then have been creamed by almost any warm body the Republicans could put up.

 

State Treasurer Alexi Giannoulis is now the consensus front runner.  He has a lot going for him, including proven vote getting skills.  Even younger than Madigan, Giannoulis has strong personal and political ties to Obama and might be expecting covert help from the White House now that Madigan is out of the picture.  But President and his operatives might conclude that the Illinois race is too toxic to become involved in, particularly if race becomes an issue.  Giannoulis is a charismatic candidate and great campaigner.  He can raise serious money, particularly from the large—and generous—Greek community.  He has been courting progressives with things like his support for workers at Hartmarx and blogging on the Daily Kos.  On the negative side there have been a few bumps that could be made into mountains during his term as Treasurer and there have been questions of how deep his personal involvement in his father’s suspect banking operations might be.

 

Christopher (Chris) Kennedy, the eighth of Bobby Kennedy’s many children has let it be known that he is interested in the race.  Outside of his name and family connections, he is largely unknown in the state despite managing his family’s Merchandise Mart in Chicago for a number of years.  He has a modest reputation as a promoter of “green business” practices.  Despite presumed participation in the city’s high level social life, it is hard even to find a news photo of the presumptive candidate or statements on public issues.  Still, he can raise a ton of money quickly and can presumably bring his illustrious family to his aid.  He may hope that the President’s deep political debt to the Kennedy clan for their support at a critical juncture in his race for the nomination might effectively check Giannoulis’s personal connections.  Some believe that he may enjoy the quiet support of Mayor Richard M. Daily, although no public commitment has been made.  On the downside, word of his likely candidacy has stirred up zero enthusiasm among rank-and-file party members and activists and cousin Caroline’s fate in New York is evidence that plenty of folks are unwilling to automatically swallow a cipher wrapped in the Kennedy mantle.

 

Many Black politicians fervently wished for an alternative to Burris. Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. thought he could be the one.  But he has been caught up in the Blagojevich soap opera and his wife, Chicago Alderman Sandi Jackson, has also been ensnared in that mess and has been criticized for being paid large sums under her maiden name for services to her husband’s congressional campaign.  Jackson can’t even count on the unified support of Chicago black politicians.  He has a long running feud with some powerful aldermen and ward committeemen.  Like Giannoulis and Madigan, he has a long personal and political relationship with the President, but may have jeopardized that with grousing about Obama not getting behind him in his feverish drive to convince Blagojevich to appoint him to the Senate.  No other major Black political figure had been willing to enter the race until Burris’ withdrawal.  Now to challenge Burris a scramble to put forth a serious Black candidate will begin.  Congressman Danny Davis might think of a run, as could any number of Chicago Aldermen and state legislators.  Obama might even prevail on his aid Valerie Jarrett, who withdrew from consideration by Blagojevich when word got out that Obama was pushing her candidacy, to enter the race.

 

On the Republican side Rep. Mark Kirk, who announced his candidacy as Madigan was renouncing hers is the Great White Hope of the Republican establishment.  He has an undeserved reputation as a moderate and “maverick” based almost exclusively on his support of environmental causes.  He has won twice in his increasingly Democratic North Shore Congressional seat.  He is photogenic and well spoken, the darling of the local media.  National Republicans are prepared to pump megabucks into his campaign in order to embarrass the President and steal what should be a safe Democratic seat from a deep blue state.  And he is the kind of non-ideological “moderate” Republican that Illinois voters have supported in the past.  He would be the toughest possible Republican to beat in a General Election.  The trouble is, he may never get a chance to make the race.  He is despised by the conservative base for lack of purity and fire.  Many would rather loose the race than elevate a “Republocrat.”  Several pipsqueak lock-and-load right-wingers are eyeing the primary, along with a few “respectable” but obscure state legislators.  If enough of them stay in the race the famous GOP circular firing squad will take care of them and let Kirk seize the nomination.  But if the kids can stop squabbling amongst themselves and unite around a single candidate—particularly one rich enough to self finance his campaign, Kirk might never make it to the big dance.

 

For Governor:

 

Governor Patrick Quinn would be the happiest man in Illinois today if he wasn’t wrestling with a confrontation with the Democratic Legislature over the budget crisis, which threatens to shut down state government and “gut the entire social services safety net” in the middle of a Depression.  Certainly his path to winning re-nomination is smoother even if his chances in November are dicey.  Quinn, a career “reformer”, earnest as a Boy Scout, honest as ol’ Abe himself, was seen as a breath of fresh air following the Blago nightmare.  But the honeymoon was short lived.  With the oratorical skills of a middle school social studies teacher and the charisma of a boiled potato, the new Governor is clearly out of his depth.  His proposed reforms of tainted campaign fiancé laws—among the loosest in the nation—have largely gone no where in the General Assembly and have alienated go-along-get-along politicians of both parties.  His proposed 50% increase in the state income tax was greeted unabashed glee by Republicans and abject terror by Democrats.  His announced slashing of social services funding has been universally denounced as “hold people hostage” and has already decimated programs and agencies around the state.  Now he has announced massive State Government lay-offs in a 1$ billion slash to state operating funds that will result in more than 2,500 layoffs.  Neither of these actions have moved the deadlocked legislature.  He has his held up a long awaited capital infrastructure plan that is chock-full of road and other projects backed up for years and which would be a powerful “jobs and stimulus” tonic to the state economy saying that he will not allow bonded road building to go forward without a budget.  Although Quinn is not without his supporters and admirers, they can’t break the logjam in the legislature.  They also can’t raise much money.  And Quinn’s own attempts to raise a war chest have been mocked for failing to uphold the lofty promises of reform that have been is career signature.  He is damned if he does and damned if he doesn’t.  Now he has a shot at winning a contested primary, but Republicans lie in the weeds eager to tie him to Blagojevich and to Democratic majorities in both houses that can’t seem to do their jobs.

 

Without Madigan in the game, there is no clear alternative to Quinn.  Perhaps State Comptroller Dan Hynes could step up.  He had been planning to run for Madigan’s job.  But she is staying put and not being suicidal he can’t challenge her.  Hynes has been increasingly critical of both the Governor and the General Assembly.  He has a power base in the Cook County organization.  He could presumably shift gears and emerge as a credible alternative.  Others are now undoubtedly testing the waters, but the rumor mill has not produced any names likely to inspire great enthusiasm.

 

Fortunately for Democrats the Republican race is crowed by midgets and whats-his-names.  Among the announced or expected luminaries to throw their hats in the ring are DuPage County Board Chairman Bob Schillerstrom, hardly a household word, and a slew of state house denizens including Sen. Matt Murphy of Palatine, Sen. Bill Brady of Bloomington, and Sen. Kirk Dillard of Hinsdale, the best known among them.  Others in the race are the usual GOP gadfly/nut job types, “pundit” Dan Proft and Adam Andrzejewski, whose ambition seems to be challenging Blagojevich for the most unpronounceable name in politics.  All of these will have to dive to the far right to try to win the Republican nomination.  And they will pound each other with relentless negative advertising.  The emerging candidate will be so bloodied and discredited that even Pat Quinn might survive.

 

Down Ticket:

 

A bunch of folks looked to move up the ladder by claiming Lisa Madigan’s job.  We have already noted Hynes, but at least he has the reasonable option of running for governor.  State Rep. Julie Hamos has been running around the state for nearly a year trying to line up support for a statewide race, presumably Attorney General.  She now needs to weigh her options.  Staying in the Senate appears to be out as she has already announced that she would not seek re-election.  She could seek Giannoulis’ job—or Hynes’ if he opts to run for governor.  Some say that even the chief executive job or the Senate seat are possibilities, but I don’t think she has the name recognition or the fund raising oomph for either of those.

 

McHenry County’s own State Representative Jack Franks has also been laying the groundwork for a run at Attorney General.  Franks got plenty of state wide and even national attention as the most relentless of Blagojevich’s many critics.  He has carved out a safe seat in traditionally Republican territory and has held it election after election by virtue of an outstanding ground operation and superb constituent service,  He tested the waters for a possible run against Blago four years ago but demurred to the Governor’s overwhelming fundraising prowess.  He, like Hamos, could try for one of the open constitutional officer seats.  His family has banking interests, so perhaps Treasurer or Comptroller is not out of the question.  Perhaps he could convince his self-proclaimed buddy, popular Secretary of State Jesse White that it is time to retire.  The Secretary of State job has been a historic launching pad for the Governorship.  But it is unlikely that Franks could realistically try for Governor or Senate.  As the most conservative Democrat in the General Assembly, Franks is not apt to generate much enthusiasm in Chicago or even the closer-in suburbs.  He decision to bail out of his commitment to Obama and endorse Hillary Clinton is a political mistake he probably already regrets.  David Axelrod and Emanuel have long memories even if the President is more forgiving.  They are in a position to crush his aspirations if they get too big.  The other problem is that Franks is something of a technophobe.  He has never even maintained a campaign web site or used TV.  He has always been about a shoe leather ground game.  That won’t be enough in a state wide race.  If stymied, Franks, unlike Hamos, can retreat to an absolutely safe seat.

 

Who is the biggest loser in all of this?  Hands down it is the hapless Joe Birkett.  The Dupage County State’s Attorney announced a second bid for Attorney General just before Madigan’s announcement believing he would be going for an open seat.  Madigan crushed Birkett in her first run and he was on the ticket for Lt. Governor in 2006.  Madigan has grown in both stature and popularity as is absolutely unbeatable as an incumbent.  Birkett does not even have the option of re-evaluating and maybe running for Governor because he can’t even count on the united support of the powerful Dupage County COP machine with two other local county politcos already in the race.

 

“May you live in interesting times,” is an ancient Chinese curse.  And these indeed are interesting times for Illinois Democrats.


Sign MoveOn’s Clean Energy Petition
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin

MoveOn dropped me an e-mail asking me to post this on my blog.  Fair enough.  A complete re-prioritization of American energy policy is key to our economic recovery in the short run and our survival on this planet in the long.

 

It's 2009. Democrats have ample majorities in both houses of Congress. President Obama campaigned on the promise to tackle climate change and boost our economy by investing in clean energy.


So why on earth is Congress considering an energy bill that:

  • Would weaken current law, repealing President Obama's authority to crack down on dirty power plants, and
  • Doesn't actually require the creation of new solar or wind power? (The Union of Concerned Scientists has concluded that the clean energy standards won't make power companies produce more clean energy than is already in the works.)

Why? Because Big Oil and Coal have teamed up with conservatives in both parties, and they've been successful in weakening the bill.

These are major flaws, but the bill has a lot of really good provisions, too. The key thing is that Congress can still strengthen it—if there's a public outcry. But we don't have much time: Congress is expected to vote on this bill in less than three weeks.


Can you sign this petition to Representative Donald Manzullo today? Eighty thousand MoveOn members have already signed. We need to double the number of signatures by Wednesday—that means we need 10 more signatures in Crystal Lake. MoveOn members will personally deliver this petition to many congressional offices the next day. Click here to add your name:


http://pol.moveon.org/cleanenergy/o.pl?id=16315-3430421-yY2.Vnx&t=4


The petition says: "We need a stronger energy bill to fulfill Obama's vision of a clean energy economy. Congress should strengthen the clean energy standards and restore Obama's authority to crack down on dirty coal plants." 


Congress must change the energy bill to require power companies to produce more clean energy for America. Wind and solar create more than twice as many jobs as coal and oil. And Congress needs to hold polluters accountable by restoring President Obama's current authority through the EPA to crack down on global warming pollution from power plants.


The Union of Concerned Scientists analysis finds that the current version of the clean energy standard "won't require utilities to use any more renewable electricity than...would be generated as a result of state renewable electricity standards already in place and the recently enacted stimulus package."
 

If we just sit back, we'll miss our chance to go big with wind and solar—and we'll lose the jobs those industries would create. Big Oil and Coal will keep getting billions of dollars in taxpayer subsidies. And President Obama will be powerless to stop more than 100 new dirty coal plants, which will crowd out the clean energy growth we need to boost our economy.


There are some good parts of the bill, but these are significant problems. As the Sierra Club's Carl Pope writes, the bill establishes strong long-term goals for cutting carbon pollution and very strong energy-efficiency investments, "but in its present form, it won't do all that's needed. The oil, coal, and dirty-utility interests...were able to prevent enactment of President Obama's much bolder vision...Yes, they will try to kill the green-jobs recovery in its cradle, and yes, they will try to block our clean-energy future."


Please urge Rep. Manzullo to fight for a stronger energy bill. Clicking here will add your name to the petition:


http://pol.moveon.org/cleanenergy/o.pl?id=16315-3430421-yY2.Vnx&t=5


Thanks for all you do.

Anna, Michael, Joan, Noah and the rest of the team


Sources:

1. Bill Needs Strengthening to Guarantee Necessary Carbon Reductions, New Green Jobs and Consumer Benefits, Science Group Says, Union of Concerned Scientists, May 14, 2009 http://www.moveon.org/r?r=51475&id=16315-3430421-yY2.Vnx&t=6


2. EPA urged to act on climate, not wait for Congress, Associated Press, May 18, 2009 http://www.moveon.org/r?r=51479&id=16315-3430421-yY2.Vnx&t=7

3. American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009, Library of Congress, May 15, 2009 http://www.moveon.org/r?r=51482&id=16315-3430421-yY2.Vnx&t=8


4. Green Recovery: A Program to Create Good Jobs and Start Building a Low-Carbon Economy, Political Economy Research Institute at the University of Massachusetts-Amherst, September 2008
http://www.peri.umass.edu/green_recovery/


5. Stopping the Coal Rush, Sierra Club

http://www.moveon.org/r?r=51483&id=16315-3430421-yY2.Vnx&t=10


6. So How Good Is This Climate Bill, Anyhow? Sierra Club, May 22, 2009
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=51478&id=16315-3430421-yY2.Vnx&t=11

 


The Elephant Grave Yard—What happens when major parties die
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin
 

Doomed and shattered, Republicans wander into insignificance.

Will Shetterly over at It’s All One Thing commented on the latest bit of Republican insanity—trying to re-name the Democrats as the National Socialist Democratic Party—you know Nazis, wink, wink.  Recognizing this was a sign of the pending irrelevance of the GOP Will asked “what happens if the Republicans implode. Our two-party system demands something to replace it,” in a comment to his own post.  Good question.

 

I got carried away trying to answer—way, way too many words.  So here’s is a little historical analysis.

 

Don’t worry this is not the first time a major political party has evaporated.  Nature and politics, abhorring a vacuum, find a replacement soon enough.

 

The Federalists shrunk first to a regional rump suspected of potential treason for trying to create a New England secession movement in the middle of the War of 1812, and then to something that met in Daniel Webster’s fob pocket and lingered only in the wistful memory of the Black Legion (that’s the New England clergy, Unitarians included.)  The supposed Era of Good Feelings barely survived the last of the Virginia Dynasty (Monroe.)  The tired remnants of the Federalists; western “National Republicans” who advocated for a vigorous Federal program of canal, turnpike and railroad construction; pro-bank (Second Bank of the United States) capitalists; and anti-tariff Southerners cobbled together the Whigs, a horse created by a committee if there ever was one.  Soon they were held together by only one thing: hatred for Andrew Jackson and the new the Democratic Party that he transformed from the old Republicans.

 

Any party whose national leadership was divided between Webster, Henry Clay, and John C. Calhoun was inherently unstable.  None of the big three was able to unite the party behind them and as a result first Webster and then Clay lost their Presidential bids.  Instead, the party turned to empty suit military men who were expected to do the bidding of Congressional Whigs while trying to steal the Jacksonian appeal of the uniformed hero.  Two of these were elected—William Henry Harrison and Zachary Taylor—both of whom died in office leaving weak, controversial vice-presidents to finish their terms, both of whom (John Tyler and Millard Fillmore) are rated high on any list of worst Presidents.  The biggest hero of all, Winfield Scott, ran and lost when the party was already dying, broken up by internal divisions over slavery, western expansion, and the tariff.

 

The new Republicans reaped the bulk of the remnants of the Northern and Western Whigs.  Southern Whigs held their noses over their distaste for “mob rule” and became re-absorbed into the Democratic Party in defense of the sacred institution of slavery.  But the Republicans were not just re-branded Whigs.  Their coalition included anti-Jacksonian Democrats many of whom had entered the Free Soil Party in opposition to the extension of slavery, and the briefly powerful American Party (Know Nothings) who were sworn enemies of immigration and “Popery.”  After a shaky launch with a third rate military hero as their candidate, John C. Frémont, they coalesced around a program of opposition to the expansion of slavery, the Whig’s old internal improvement program, and high tariffs.  Enter an obscure prairie lawyer and add in a Civil War and the rest is history.

 

It’s been Democrats vs. Republicans ever since with third and fourth parties making brief bids joining the club (Greenback, Prohibition,  Populist, Socialist, Progressive, Dixiecrat, American Independent, Reform, Libertarian and Green.)  Most of those parties were largely reabsorbed by one of the major parties or had their platforms largely adopted by one of them (Prohibition, Populist, Progressive, Socialist and American Independent (George Wallace.)  And over the course of more than 150 years the two parties have made a polar switch on issues as basic as the role of Federal power, the expansion of the franchise, and race relations.  Neither Jefferson and Jackson or Lincoln would recognize the parties that claim them.

 

The Republicans seem destined to most closely track the Federalists into regional party status followed by slow withering.  But a new alignment, the shape of which can dimly be perceived, is inevitable.  Probably built around a core of the old Republicans plus conservative Democrats, led by some of the current Blue Dogs in Congress, and balanced budget hawks.  Because it will need, demographically, not to become the “White” party, it will probably try to appeal to Hispanics by adopting a moderate immigration policy (but this will lead to great tension within the new party) and moderate social conservatism.  It will try desperately to distance itself from dominance of the Religious Right, which will spin off on its own separatist orbits.  It will largely give up on attempts to reach African Americans and try building a coalition of Whites and other minorities against perceived claims of special treatment for Blacks.  It will surely reap some other Democrats who become disenchanted for whatever reason with Obama’s inevitable transformation of his party.

 

I see a new party along those lines up, running, and challenging by-then entrenched Democratic dominance with in ten years.

 


DOOR BELLS AND SHOE LEATHER
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin
 

On Saturday, Patrick Murfin, with Meredith Reed Sarkees one of the Change for Nunda candidates for Township Trustee, was out canvassing for votes the old fashioned way—by ringing door bells and talking to actual voters.  He had to work fast with a heavy spring snow storm threatening to close in.  He will be hitting the bricks again next weekend.  So will volunteers in other “urban” precincts.

 

While the tactic may be traditional, a high tech voter data base enables Democratic Party Precinct Representatives to target likely supporters.  Getting those supporters to the polls on April 7 or to cast an early vote is critical to electoral success.

 

Voters, including those in more rural areas of Nunda Township, are also being contacted by phone and by  post card mailing.


AND THE WINNERS ARE...
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin


Change for Nunda candidates Patrick Murfin and Meredith Reid Sarkees  congratulate the winners of the Republican Party Primary, Tom Palmer, Joni Smith, James C. Schlader, and Kelvin “Lee” Jennings.  We look forward to engaging them in a vigorous debate about the future of our township.  The vote totals courtesy of McVote are:

 

NUNDA TWP TRUSTEE

 

 

Vote for

4

 

Precincts Reporting

29/29

100.00%


TOM PALMER

REP

581

19.95%

JONI SMITH

REP

540

18.54%

JAMES C. SCHLADER

REP

512

17.58%

RICHARD MEYERS

REP

412

14.14%

KELVIN JENNINGS

REP

480

16.48%

KEVIN SARNWICK

REP

388

13.32%

 

 

All four trustee candidates ran together as part of Team Nunda, which was led by powerful highway commissioner Don Kopsell, who was unopposed in the primary.  Dennis Jagla crushed Alan Weaver, the candidate who ran as a “soft” Republican and who appealed for Democratic support with a disingenuous mailer.

 

All in all, it was a triumph for the regular Republican political machine and business as usual.  Team Nunda can leave out all of those campaign signs already dotting the township.  They probably believe that they can sprint toward victory in the April 7 Consolidated Election while hardly breaking a sweat.

 

But only about 850 voters participated in the primary.  They represent, for the most part, the core of party diehards. The spring election is also typically a low turn-out affair.  But this time Democrats and the many Independents, who are loath to identify party preference to their friends and neighbors, will be in the mix.  And these voters are eager to see the refreshing winds of change and reform blow through this corner of the county as they have blown through Washington.  They know that the economic crisis faced by all of us will bring new challenges to township government that can only be met with fresh eyes and hands.

 

Meanwhile, over in Algonquin Township Linda A. Lance, Joseph H. Powalowski, incumbent Niels E. Sorensen, and Lowell A. Cutsforth crushed perennial looser Mark Guerra upholding the unchallenged supremacy of Highway Commissioner Bob Miller.  What is it about highway commissioners as Republican satraps anyway?

 

They will face Democratic nominees Robert Frank, Frank Hyden, and James McTague.

 

Democrats and Independents have often skipped the spring off-year election because the races are low profile and they have assumed the contests—when there are any—have been decided by an unchallengeable GOP machine.  But if we can get only one quarter of the folks who cast Democratic ballots in the 2008 Primary or who in the privacy of the voting booth changed the political landscape of McHenry County forever by decisively supporting Barack Obama, we can win.  Yes we can!

 

It is our job to make sure those Democrats and Independents know what is at stake.  You will be hearing from us.  We will be reminding you to vote—and to cast your votes only for the Democratic Party nominees in these townships.


GOP TOWNSHIP ASSESSOR CANDIDATE SENDS PHONY DEM MAILING
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin

I came home from work and was mystified to find a slick postcard mailing splashed with Democratic blue and featuring prominent donkey logos promoting Alan Weaver for Nunda Township Assessor.  I went to his web site and confirmed that he is running in the Republican primary.  My guess is that this was a special targeted mailing to Dems to get us to vote in the Republican primary under the theory that anyone opposed to the incumbents are our allies.  It does mean that he is pretty well financed for a Township campaign if he can afford to print and send a special mailing to Democrats.  I am not sure if he will succeed in attracting any votes.  I think his message is confusing.  And as a real Democratic candidate for office in Nunda Township, I certainly won't be voting in a Republican primary or encouraging anyone else to do so.


THE BIG DAY
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin
The Moment.

Celebrating in Crystal Lake at the MoveOn party at Porter’s Oyster Bar.

Hallelujah! It is done. With pageantry and oddly humble pomp. With people—millions of live witnesses and millions more around the glob.  Barack Hussein Obama is the 44th President of the United States!  There is  literally nothing I can add to the torrent of words and images that have documented the event and our celebration of it.

 

Except perhaps this.  It was not just Obama’s day, it was ours, all of ours.  We were as intimately involved as was he and his family.  His triumph was our triumph.  Together we have made history. And together—as the President made clear himself in his Inaugural Address—we will share sacrifice and struggle and make some more.

 

I do reflect on how far we have come in a relatively short time.  On January 20, 2006, just days after launching this blog, I posted Democrats:  Defining Who We Are.  It was a draft of an introduction to a proposed collaboration with then McHenry County Democratic Party Chair Patrick Ouimet on a document to outline what it means to be a Democrat.  The article reflected on the dismal condition of the party—and of liberalism and progressivism in general—just three short years ago.

 

Just a year later, on January 17, 2007 this little pop stand reacted to Obama’s announcement that he was officially forming an exploratory campaign committee with an enthusiastic endorsement of his candidacy.  This is what I wrote back then:

 

Yesterday, January 16th, Senator Barak Obama announced he was going to run for the Democratic Party nomination for the Presidency—almost.  In the elaborate dance made necessary by custom, the arcane labyrinth of Federal election law and the urgency of fund raising, the Senator from Illinois firmly put his right foot on the ballroom floor.

  

In an e-mail to supporters the Senator announced the formation of an exploratory committee, the necessary first step which allows serious fund raising.  He promises to follow up with a formal announcement of his eagerly awaited candidacy on February 10th.

 

The announcement came a day after another acclaimed Obama speech to the annual Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Day celebration at the Push/Rainbow Coalition in Chicago.  With modesty, humor, and dignity Obama laid out how he stood on the shoulders of Dr. King and other civil rights pioneers and martyrs.  He extolled their achievement, but left no doubt that the fulfillment of their vision remains the challenge of the rising generation.  It was a great speech.  But then we have come to expect great speeches from this man.

 

Obama is unique among all of the political figures I have known or observed in my life time.  Years before he rose to national prominence following his keynote address to the 2004 Democratic National Convention, people who met the skinny young politician even for a few minutes went away muttering to themselves that they had shaken hands with a future president.  He had that kind of effect on people.

 

I know he did on me.  In a chance encounter in the dust outside the dispersing Democrat Day Rally at the Illinois State Fair in 2003 Diane Oltman-Ayers introduced me to an acquaintance, a young state senator from Chicago.  He was known to be joining the crowded field running for the upcoming Senate nomination in 2004.  He was quite alone and entourageless.  At the time I was the lowly vice-chair of the then puny McHenry County Democratic Party, a figure of next to zero political influence.  Yet he engaged us in conversation for about twenty minutes displaying a keen recognition of the political challenges and realities ahead of him and a close and carefully reasoned grasp of complex issues all wrapped up in a warm and witty personality.

 

I came away quite frankly dazzled by the experience.  But with that power of shrewd political prognostication, for which I am so well noted, I was saddened that such an outstanding candidate had no chance for election because of his unfortunate name.

  

In the primary election that followed, I signed on early in support of radio host and liberal activist Nancy Skinner’s doomed candidacy.  I recognized I had placed the wrong bet by mid-campaign.  I felt compelled to honor my original commitment to Skinner, but on Election Day was elated by Obama’s victory.

 

His unprecedented sweep to victory in the November election by an historic margin laid to rest any doubts.  The Convention speech came as no surprise to us in Illinois, it only served to introduce him to a larger stage.

 

The Freshman Senator’s rise was meteoric.  He was mentioned as a possible Presidential contender before his bags were fairly un-packed in Washington.  He was the object of sometimes idolizing press coverage.  Meanwhile he tried to keep his head down, lower expectations, and get on with the job of learning to be an effective senator.

 

But as the disastrous Residency of George W. Bush unraveled, Democrats from across the country turned increasingly to Obama.  As did many ordinary Americans of all races and regions, with whom he struck a responsive cord.  Talk of the Presidency could no longer be gainsaid.

 

Of course the higher Obama soared, he invited a chorus of skeptics.  Many painted him as a matinee idol, unproven in the Senate or in crisis, a mere cipher whose true opinions and positions remained veiled.

  

But those who came to know him recognized that the senator was indeed the real deal.  He has a piercing intelligence coupled with a strong work ethic.  Colleges in the State Senate and the U.S. Senate both soon came to recognize that he was thoroughly prepared on every subject and willing to work hard, including reaching across the isle to ideological opponents, to work out practical solutions for thorny problems.

  

His noted oratorical skills, in an age when the political speech has largely been replaced as an art form by the 30 second sound bite, rest not only on the strength of his magnetic personality, but on the depth of capacity as a writer.  No American politician since Lincoln has been so literarily gifted.  It shows not just in his speeches, but in his two best selling memoirs.

 

The right-wing posse of radio ranters, cable talking heads, and scriveners planted by important sounding think tanks, fear Obama as they fear no other Democrat.  They dream of running against the hated Hillary, but he sends shivers up their spines.  Yet they are reduced to drawing attention to his name and hinting that his father’s Islam makes him an un-trustworthy jihadist mole in American politics.  Or that a minor, but strait forward, real estate transaction with an Illinois political bag man tied to the Blagojevich administration, might tarnish his image as an honest strait shooter.  But it is futile.  In the end they have to fall back on the unspoken hope that in their heart of hears once inside the voting booth most white voters will be unable to pull a vote for a black man as President—the Harold Ford effect. But this time, they are wrong.

 

Which is why for the first time Heretic, Rebel, a Thing to Flout is proud to put all of its mighty influence and resources at the disposal of Senator Obama.  We want to be among the first media outlets to unreservedly endorse Obama for President of the United States.

 

Across the nation, Democratic operatives for lesser candidates (especially Hillary Clinton) quake in their boots as they realize the awesome implications of this endorsement.

 

But then again so will some of Obama’s staff people when they realize that their boy has been endorsed in a blog named Heretic, Rebel, a Thing to Flout, obviously the creation of some wild-eyed misfit somewhere.

 

Yet we press boldly forward and invite all of our dozens of faithful readers to join in our support of the Next President of the United States.

 


DON'T DO IT, ROLAND!--Advise from an Admirer and Supporter
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin


Roland Burris

First off, let’s get this straight.  There is nothing wrong with Roland Burris.  In fact, there is an awful lot right about him.  And I am not just saying that because of our mutual affection for cowboy hats—Burris often donned one when making appearances at the Illinois State Fair or other downstate events.  

 

No, Burris was a fine public servant.  He was the first African-American elected to statewide office in Illinois, opening doors for the likes of Carol Moseley Braun,  Jesse White, and Barack Obama himself.  He served three terms from 1979-1991 as State Comptroller and a single term as Attorney General from 1991-1995.  He acquitted himself honestly and honorably in both positions and was popular with the voters.  He often led state-wide Democratic tickets.

 

Burris’s problems, and an undeserved reputation as a looser, arose when he tried to “move up.”  Despite his own breakthrough accomplishments, Democratic primary voters repeatedly rejected his attempts at higher office.  There was no disgrace in the first loss in 1984 to Paul Simon for the U.S. Senate nomination.  The popular Simon went on to a stellar career as one of the Senate’s leading liberal lights.  But he failed to win the nomination for Governor in 1994, 1998, and 2002.  (I supported his ’98 primary bid.) And he made a kamikaze run against incumbent Richard M. Daley for Mayor of Chicago in 1995.  But Burris likes to point out that he never lost an election to a Republican.

 

According to reports on the Chicago Tribune web page, bad boy and prisoner-in-waiting Governor Rod Blagojevich is set to announce Burris’s appointment to Obama’s vacated Senate seat at a press conference today.  Cue the wailing and gnashing of teeth.  And despite my personal affection for and admiration of Burris, count me among the chest beaters and hair pullers.

 

This is just another hand grenade launch by the Govmaniac to show how much damage he can do if cornered.  His only hope now is to scare the Illinois House shitless in hopes that they will have a failure of nerve and not proceed to vote a bill of impeachment.

 

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has already reiterated his statement that the Senate Democratic Caucus will refuse to seat Burris or any nominee of the tainted Governor.  Senator Dick Durbin pointedly also signed the statement.  State legislative leaders are also predictably outraged and the “dick move,” as one privately put it, will probably only accelerate the momentum toward an impeachment vote.

 

 

I know Roland wants the job.  He sees it as a well earned capstone on a distinguished career.  He feels he would be good at it.  He wants to support the Obama agenda.  

 

But for the sake of his own political legacy, which can only be clouded by an appointment under such circumstances; for the sake of the Democratic Party, which might not be able to hold the seat in two years; for the sake of the people of Illinois who deserve better; for the sake of the Obama agenda, which does not need the distraction of a Senate battle—with the prospect of Republican gleefully voting to seat him in the hopes of creating the greatest possible carnage, Roland Burris should decline the invitation to the dance.


 

 

Update:  2:48—Channel 2 News reports that the Blagojevich, with Burris at his side, made the nomination official.  Illinois Secretary of State Jesse White says he will not certify the nomination, a significant obstacle to making the nomination legal and official.


 


GUEST BLOGGER CAROLYN QUINN--My Joe Biden
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin



 

Our favorite guest blogger Carolyn covered Barack Obama’s Springfield announcement in February 2007,  Now she has sent along her very personal message to Senator Joe Biden welcoming him to the Democratic ticket.  You can send a message of your own.  Just go to http://my.barackobama.com/welcomejoe

 

Dear Senator Biden—

 

I saw Senator Biden for the first time in Chicago, July 15th of '07.  I only saw him because I wanted to hear Barack Obama speak again.  But it was Joe Biden that day who was fabulous on the stage.  It was Joe Biden who afterward shook my hand and asked me my name.  It was Joe Biden who sat down next to me and shared his amusement in the moment.  He introduced his two sons to me, and his wife Jill. He signed my hat and dated it, which is why I know the day I first saw Senator Biden in person.  He is one dynamic and personable human being. On top of that, some months later, he had the best (by far) tailgate party at Soldiers' Field at the AFL-CIO debates.  But all that stuff is just the frosting.

 

Like Senator Obama, Joe Biden is an expert on Constitutional Law.  At this time in history, our Constitution needs a champion like never before.

 

Ever.

 

The president and the vice president swear above all, and before the world, to Defend and Protect the Constitution of the United States of America.  The talk I hear surrounding a laundry list of why Bush/Cheney should be impeached, is talk concerned with the rule of law.  But it does not address the item which seems to me to be the truest – and also the best reason to show Senator McCain the exit sign before he ever enters the White House.  President Bush did not defend our constitution: he consistently skirted our constitution, defied our constitution and demeaned our constitution.  Breach of contract, pure and simple.  And Senator McCain promises to do the same.

 

We cannot allow it.

 

Today we have Senators Obama AND Biden standing together on the steps of the Old State Capitol in my home state, which of course calls Abe Lincoln to mind.  President Lincoln defended the Union when it was under fire from within, and it was a tremendous personal struggle.  President Obama must defend our Constitution which is now under fire from within.  While we are not looking at civil war over it, we are looking at some severe civil strife.  This, too, will be a tremendous struggle. Senator Joe Biden is the best possible person to be his partner-champion in this struggle.

 

They say Barack Obama brings us hope, a phenomenon.  I see it differently.  He brings us inspiration to act, to volunteer, to participate.

 

The volunteer armies of regular Americans who are doing all that footwork are the phenomenon that brings us hope. Barack gave us the inspiration and encouragement to live hope, enact hope, be hope.

 

My welcome message to Senator Joe Biden: I could not be more thrilled, knowing you are on our ticket, and it IS "our" ticket.  You are part of the inspiration.  And you are part of the work to enact hope.  You are a most welcome member of the team.

 

You are a champion.

 

Carolyn Quinn

 

 


THE TONYA HARDING OPTION--Will Clinton Take It?
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin
 



Hillary Clinton as Tonya Harding?  Obama as Nancy Kerrigan? Bill Clinton as Jeff Gillooly?

 


That I am an ardent supporter of Barack Obama is patently obvious.  But I have tried, sometimes with limited success, to stay out of the tit-for-tat jabs and counter punches between the Clinton and Obama campaigns, their surrogates, and their most rabid followers.  Virtual trench war fare has been spiraling out of control for some time, but has sharply escalated since the Tsunami Tuesday primaries in which Clinton scratched back into contention with wins in Ohio and Texas (primary vote only, not total delegates).  During the long and agonizing interim until the Pennsylvania primary (of which Clinton is the presumptive winner) the air has been filled with brick bats, hand grenades and vitriol.  Let me count the ways:


·         Mutual sniping over possible re-dos in Florida and Michigan and/or the seating of the delegations despite breaking party rules.


·         The flap about Obama advisor Samantha Power calling Clinton “something of a monster.”


·         Geraldine Ferraro’s demeaning remarks that Obama was “lucky to be black” and her repeated, pugnacious refusal on every TV program she could find to back down one inch.


·         The Obama campaign’s call on the Clinton’s to release their income tax forms.


·         The Clinton campaign’s denunciation of that call as a reminiscent of despised Special Prosecutor Kenneth Starr.


·         The huge uproar over snippets of sermons from Obama’s former pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright.


·         Suggestions by some Obama staffers that the Clinton campaign was exploiting the issue to “play the race card.”


·         Reacting to Obama’s widely praised speech on race, Clinton surrogates suggest that the speech was a failure because Obama did not personally repudiate Wright.


·         Clinton surrogates using the Wright connection to argue to wavering Super Delegates that Obama was fatally injured and “un-electable.”


·         Obama supporters circulation photo of Bill Clinton with Wright in the White House.


·         Bill Clinton’s remark that a Clinton-McCain match-up in November would be refreshing because it would be between two candidates who “love their country.”


·         The Obama Campaign’s sharp retort that the former President coment, “sounds like McCarthy.”


·         Attacks on Clinton’s credibility when she was caught telling a colorful but untrue story about landing in Bosnia “under sniper fire.”


·         Clinton personally resurrecting the Wright controversy the same day she came under intense questioning about the Bosnia Story by saying, "He would not have been my pastor."


 

Have I forgotten something?  I’m sure I missed a dozen minor skirmishes.  Both sides are now full and eager participants.  But I have to give the Clinton camp the edge for starting down this road and setting the increasingly bitter tone.


 

Here’s the thing.  As entertaining as all of this might be for political junkies, it is disasterous for the the Democratic Party, whose once bright prospects in November are in peril.  Not only could the party loose the Presidential election, the effects could be felt all the way down the ticket erroding what should have been huge gains in the Senate and House.  What’s worse, the American people could be saddled with a McCain (Bush III) presidency and a feeble Democratic majority in Congress unable to challenge him.


 

Every one knows it.  Every one talks about it. But neither side can help themselves.  Each blames the other guy or gal (I’ll take my licking from the word police now) and turns right back to the bashing.  It’s a classic case of looking “at the speck that is in your brother's eye,”  not noticing  “the log that is in your own eye?” (Matthew 7.3 New American Standard Bible.)



I have joined others in pledging support of the Democratic Party candidate in November who ever he or she is.  The alternative is unthinkable.  If that means its Hillary, I will swallow my bitter disappointment and throw my shoulder to the wheel with real purpose.  I call on others on both sides who claim they can never, ever, under any circumstances support the other in November to get over themselves and their allegiances and help save America..


 

Now comes and inevitable “but.”  I couldn’t help but smiling at the introduction of a new phrase to describe the Clinton campaign’s narrow chance to win the nomination.  On Tuesday ABC reporter Jack Tapper blogged quoting a source in the Democratic National Committee (DNC):


 

The question is -- what will Clinton have to do in order to achieve it?


What will she have to do to Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, in order to eke out her improbable victory?


She will have to "break his back," the official said. She will have to destroy Obama, make Obama completely unacceptable.


"Her securing the nomination is certainly possible - but it will require exercising the 'Tonya Harding option.'" the official said. "Is that really what we Democrats want?"


The Tonya Harding Option -- the first time I've heard it put that way.


It implies that Clinton is so set on ensuring that Obama doesn't get the nomination, not only is she willing to take extra-ruthless steps, but in the end neither she nor Obama win the gold.


Well, the Tonya Harding Option is such a well turned phrase that it has spread like the measles all over the internet and is already appearing in respectable print.  By tomorrow it will already be a cliché. 


Instead of trying to refute the story, however, Clinton seems to be confirming it as her strategy.  Faced with stories from Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and others that “things are being done,” to bring a quick end to the divisive campaign and trial balloons from the DNC that a “mini convention” of super delegates may bee convened, Clinton defiantly said that race will go on at least “three more months” and charged that the Obama campaign was trying to “to shut this race down."


Given Obama’s virtually insurmountable delegate advantage, that declaration may be a broad hint that
Clinton is willing to oil up the crow bar.



And that’s not good.






RICH GARLING--Island Lake Trustee Announces Race for State Representative
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin

Rich Garling, an Island Lake Trustee, has announced his candidacy for election to the Illinois General Assembly 52nd District. Garling, a longtime Democrat and resident of Island Lake, said that he feels that it is time for a change in representation for the people of the 52nd District. 

Garling, who is also a former member of the Dekalb County Board, feels that skyrocketing property taxes are the most important issue to the people of the 52nd District.  Garling believes that if the State of Illinois pays its fair share of education dollars, we can help relieve the burden to local taxpayers. "We have become overly reliant on property taxes for the way we fund our local public schools," stated Garling. "Fiscal discipline is an idea Springfield needs to relearn." He assured voters that "I will use my business and local government background to change this broken system."

In particular, seniors living on fixed incomes should not have to worry about rising property taxes driving them out of their homes, Garling believes. "I strongly support assessment freezes for qualified seniors, the disabled, military veterans and personnel currently serving on active duty" vowed Garling.

Our community also deserves the best schools, teachers and educational programs, Garling said. "Our society thrives when we have an educated populace. We all suffer when resources are mismanaged. As your state Representative, I will advocate for an increase in state school funding in the  52nd District," Garling said.

In addition, Garling realizes that efficient roads and safety are important concerns to everyone in the  52nd District. "Many of our communities struggle to fund road improvement projects to handle our ever-increasing population growth. I will work hard to bring more state and federal money to improve roads and relieve gridlock," said Garling.

As Chairman of Economic Development for Island Lake, Garling understands how to retain and attract businesses here in Lake/McHenry County. Growing businesses and well-paying, sustainable jobs are essential to the economic vitality of the region and contribute to the local tax base. "We should encourage companies to move to our area. They should not have to worry about being slapped with exorbitant fees or having to navigate unreasonable bureaucratic obstacles," Garling declared. 

Environmental protection is also a top priority for Garling and is essential to maintaining our parks, wetlands and other natural resources. "I understand the importance of expanding recycling and energy efficiency programs for homes and businesses, and helping ensure everyone in our area has access to a safe, clean water supply. By supporting initiatives like The Metropolitan Mayors Caucus Greenest Region Compact or the Cool Cities Compacts we can work towards keeping our environment clean and healthy for generations to come," he said.

Rich Garling is 52 years old and has lived in Island Lake for 19 years, serving as trustee since his election in 2007. He served on the Dekalb County Board from 1980 - 82. His business career has included leadership positions in sales & marketing and in computer systems.

The 52nd District represents voters in McHenry, Lake and Cook Counties and covers all or parts of the municipalities of Island Lake, Port Barrington, Lakemoor, Wauconda, Barrington, Round Lake, Bull Valley, Cary, Prairie Grove, Lake Barrington, Johnsburg, Fox Lake and Fox River Grove.

Since no candidate ran for this office in the February Primary, Garling will seek the support of Party Chairs in the three counties to be caucused into the open Democratic nomination for the fall election.

 


BOB KAEMPFE RUNS FOR DEMOCRATIC NOD IN ILLINOIS 64TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin

 BOB KAEMPFE

Retired postal worker Robert Kaempfe of Crystal Lake filled petitions with the Secretary of State’s office in Springfield on Wednesday to run for the Democratic nomination in the 64th District, Illinois General Assembly.  The seat is currently held by Republican Michael Tryon.

            “I’m not a rich guy trying to buy a political position,” Kaempfe said. “I am not a career politician.  I have always been a working guy and know what concerns regular working people.”

            Kaempfe, who recently retired, was Chief Trustee of his local union, a shop steward, and chief steward of the 600 employee Palatine Distribution Center.  “My experience as a negotiator will stand me in good stead in seeking to work with other legislators to get the best for our communities.”

            A long time Crystal Lake resident, Kaempfe is a decorated Vietnam veteran.  He served with the 101st Airborn Division.  Among his awards are the Bronze Star, Army Commendation Medal with a “V” for valor, Air Medal, and the Combat Infantry Badge.

            Kaempfe identifies securing funding for long delayed capital projects, including critical road projects, as a top priority.  He also advocates better long range transportation planning, “not just ten or fifteen years out, but to meet needs thirty or more years from now.”

 


UNIVERSALSIM AND FREE MASONRY--What Historic Connections?
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin

                                


           Over on the UNITARIAN UNIVERSALSIT HISORICAL SOCIETY e-mail list—one of my favorite resources and sources of both wisdom and inspiration—there has been a discussion of the relationship of UNIVERSALISM and FREE MASONRY that raises several interesting questions which only challenging research can answer.  And it may offer an opportunity to de-bunk a persistent myth about 19th Century Universalists that is still propagated even within our own ranks.  First the questions:

 

1)      How does Universalist participation in Masonry compare with the rates of participation in other Protestant denominations in the period?  This will be very difficult to gauge because neither the Masons or the churches are apt to have kept any statistics.  It may best be researched by, for instance, checking obituary notices for Masonic funerals and cross-checking for mention of religious affiliation.  Tedious work at best which would have to be replicated in many localities over the country to get a clear picture.

2)      How many Masons were more or less “free thinkers,” drawn to Masonry as an alternative religion to orthodox Christianity.  In the 18th Century there was a high correlation between DEISM and Masonry, at least among the educated elite as evidenced by a head-and-philosophy count of leading figures among the FOUNDERSWASHINGTON, FRANKLIN, etc.  Did this sheltering of the religiously un-orthodox continue on a significant scale into the mid-19th Century?

3)      What effect, if any, did the powerful ANTI-MASONIC MOVEMENT have on participation by Universalists?  This movement became a political powerhouse, particularly in New York State where the Anti-Masonic Party won several legislative seats and elected in its own right or backed sympathetic members of other parties—MARTIN VAN BUREN*, for instance—state wide officials and judges.  The here-to-fore vigorous growth of Masonry, which had basked in the glow of identification with the Revolutionary Period, was stopped by this movement and in many areas membership went into steep decline.  Upstate New York was both a Universalist stronghold and ground zero for Anti-Masonry so investigation there would be fruitful.  Did the pariah status of Universalism among orthodox Christians somehow inure its members from the stampede to the exits by those less used to societal disapprobation?

 

And now for that myth—that Universalism was largely confined to the lower margins of society.  This stems from the fact that Universalism spread vigorously along the frontier thanks to the efforts of its heroic saddle bag ministers.  Indeed there were many hard-scrabble farmers and dwellers of remote hamlets.  But by the third decade of the 19th the majority of members were in established churches in cities and substantial (in terms of that era) towns.  In New England, many were drawn from the ranks of established—and prosperous—farmers as well as the ranks of the “mechanics.”  To our modern ears this sounds like the grease-under-the-fingernails grubby working class.  But it meant the class of master craftsmen—coopers, printers, smiths of all kinds, shipwrights, carpenters and joiners, tailors, shoemakers, milliners, etc.  These were business proprietors and employers—sometimes of large numbers—of apprentices and laborers. Along with the class of shop proprietors, despite the social disdain of whatever local aristocracy strutted its stuff, they were pillars of the community.  They represented what may be called the “burger” class and—especially in towns and middling cities short on local barons—represented the solid leadership of the community.  It was from this stratum of the community that Masonry drew heavily.   Confirming an unusually high correlation between membership in Universalist churches and Masonic lodges would go a long way toward proving that Universalim was not just the religious hope of the “lower orders” but was solidly bourgeois.

 

*How about a rare footnote in a blog entry? An astute and knowledgeable expert on Masonry, to whom I sent this essay, asked why I mentioned Van Buren, a Democrat.  Most anti-Masons in New York were ADAMS MEN—supporters of JOHN QUINCY ADAMS’-- the NATIONAL REPUBLICAN PARTY.  In New York state it was largely the creation of political mastermind THURLOW WEED  as part of ANTI-JACKSON movement that eventually evolved into the WHIGS and the modern REPUBLICAN PARTY.  So how did the RED FOX OF KINDERHOOK—Van Buren—who built the DEMOCRATIC PARTY in New York State, became ANDREW JACKSON’S trusted Vice President and personal choice to succeed him become enmeshed with anti-Masonry?   In building the powerful ALBANY REGENCY, one of the first political machines, Van Buren,  always a pragmatist, used anti-Masonic elements to defeat rival elements of the Democratic Party.  Eventually Weed was able to consolidate support among anti-Masons and while Van Buren was in Washington as Vice President and unable to attend the machine at home, finally defeat the Regency in the election for governor in 1838.

 


Say No to 50 Years in Iraq
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin

                         

THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY e-mailed  me and asked if I could write a letter to the editor about the Resident’s plan for a 50 year or more deployment in IRAQ and the support it has been getting from across the field of imperial wann-a-bes known collectively as the REPUBLICAN presidential candidates.  I was glad to oblige.  Since I just had a missive printed in the NORTHWEST HERALD, my usual outlet for such letters, I sent this one to the DAILY HERALD.  I urge any of you to use the handy tool on the Party web site and send your own letters.

To the Editor--

Gee, it’s been so swell hanging around the Korean Peninsula for 50 plus years and waiting for a war to break out, that the President and his brain trust think it would be just peachy if we could do the same thing in Iraq. 

 

Never mind that there will be no “truce line” to separate us from our potential enemies.  They’ll be mixed up higgly-piggly with the local population just out side the gates of the massive bases this scheme envisions. 

 

Never mind that  there will be no government on the other side, not even one run by a crack-pot family dynasty a la North Korea, with which to negotiate if problems arise and things get dicey.

 

Never mind that that there likely will not even be an allied government that wants them to stay. Right now a majority of the Iraqi parliament wants to revoke the UN mandate under which the U.S. occupation is conducted and set an absolute deadline for our withdrawal from the country.

 

Never mind the overwhelming majority of the American people want this insanity over and done with NOW.

 

Senator John McCain says the President’s idea is just fine with him.  The other contenders for the Republican nomination, even those who stare at their shoes when the unpopular president is mentioned, agree.

 

Want to stop this?  Make sure a Democrat is elected our next president.  Senator Obama is my first choice, but any of the leading contenders would put the breaks on this bit of hubris in short order.

 

 

Patrick Murfin,

Crystal Lake, Illinois


MoveOn Under Seige--A Responce
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin

ALTERNET is one of my go-to sources for alternative news and views on the net.  I also deeply appreciate how easy they make the give and take conversation over their postings.  I urge every one who might not be familiar with them to check them out.

Last week they ran an INTERVIEW with MOVEON.ORG founders WES BOYD and JOAN BLADES which explained how the grass roots/net roots organization works and responded to the torrent of criticism MoveOn has gotten for supporting the House Democratic Iraq War funding bill which included a set withdrawal date.  You can read the interview via the link above and decide for yourself if MoveOn is a sell out or a tool of the Democratic leadership.

Naturally, given the recent controversy, this article elicited a ton of responses, counter responses, taunts and jeers.  That is to be expected.  Folks are passionate about ending the war and often divided over the best message.  Even those of us who ended up supporting the House bill and worked through MoveOn to help secure its passage, wish that it were stronger.  Most of us heartily would prefer an absolute cut off for funds to continue to prosecute the disastrous and illegal war.  Others, myself included, were even more alarmed that text explicitly denying the Resident the right to unilaterally launch an attack on neighboring Iran, was jettisoned from the final bill.

It was not surprising that the dialogue and rhetoric responding to the interview as passionate and often very negative.  What was alarming was how vituperative much of it was, how vicious in attacking the motive of any one not willing to press an all-or-nothing agenda, and, frankly, how unhinged.

What follow are comments that I  posted almost at random in the stream of invective.

 

Ok. I know there are a lot of frustrated, angry and well meaning folks out there. There is a need to blow off steam, a need to call the wayward back to the one true path. That’s fine. Go ahead, if it makes you feel better. If it energizes you to do something, even better.

But after reading some the hysterical diatribes unleashed in response to this article  I cannot help but wonder how many of these are from folks that are well paid to sow as much dissention in the ranks as possible? How many from lunatic right volunteers who know just how to push our buttons and enjoy watching us go for each other’s throats.

Call me paranoid, and some of you will. Accuse me of being the agent my self. But I have been around for a very long time and have actually seen these kinds of operations done by pros from the FBI plants among the organizers of the Democratic Convention actions in 1968, to the old Chicago Red Squad, to the Nixon dirty tricks gang. And now the anonymity of the e-mail and the blog-o-shere makes it ridiculously easy.

Hold fast to your values and opinions. Speak your mind. But before you march off to burn down the barn of “Those People” down the road, make sure the guy handing you the torch doesn’t have an entirely different agenda on his mind than you do on yours.


Dispatch from Springfield--Obama Makes it Official
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin



(Photo by MARY MARGARET MAULE)

CAROLYN QUINN, the Secretary of the McHENRY COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY, was one of a carload of local Dems who drove down to Springfield this morning to hear BARACK OBAMA announce his candidacy for President of the United States at the historic OLD STATE CAPITAL—the building where Abraham Lincoln served in the state legislature, delivered his HOUSE DIVIDED speech, debated Stephen Douglas, and after a bitter war and martyrdom was laid in State for his friends and neighbors.  I asked Carolyn--who shares the honor with Virginia Red of being one of the only two guest contributors on this blog—to be our Special Correspondent at the historic event.  She complied with her usual enthusiasm, good eye for detail, and serious writing chops. 

 

Postcard perfect clear sky:

Left my camera bag, purse and backpack in the car on purpose to have less stuff to worry about.  Did bring THE AUDACITY OF HOPE and today’s copy of the SPRINGFIELD JOURNAL with Barack all over the front page.  I had planned to get them both autographed.

Wicked cold.  Where you think twice about taking in the next breath because the frigid gases seem downright invasive. 

A Mark Twain impersonator passed by on the sidewalk as we approached the OLD STATE HOUSE - and of course Abe Lincoln.  Both looked real enough.  A couple kids hawking tee shirts and buttons (but I didn’t buy any because the money wasn’t going to the Obama campaign – plus I didn’t have my purse.)

Long lines at 8:30 AM to enter the courtyard area, and despite the biting cold, spirits were incredibly high.  Nobody jostled for a better place in line.  We met one another in line.  I shook many mittened hands this morning.  People of different ages, backgrounds, races, regions, were all pleasant and of a single group spirit.  Today we shared a common hope.  To be able to make the difference in changing government to be more responsive to ordinary peoples’ lives.  Like our own.  And we hope this guy is the one to help us make it happen.  Townies were proud to host the announcement of Obama’s presidential bid.  Way proud.  Travelers were just thrilled to be there and shared how far they had come – how early they had arisen – with the same sense of pride.  What we all shared was a personal investment in the hope that we can reclaim America.  Debbie Ross from Lincoln, Illinois sang the STAR SPANGLED BANNER, and my friend Sam said she is the same woman who sang at his wedding.

He offered himself up as a vehicle today.  Why do we hope Barack is the one to help make us more able to affect change in the overall political climate?  All along he has been listening to the stories of ordinary people.  Listening carefully enough to remember our stories and pass them on.  To tie the stories together with a meaningful thread of who we are, what our challenges are, and how we try so hard against so many obstacles.  He heard people who are like me, it seems, because when he tells their stories, it sounds like he is telling my story and getting the gist of why I work so hard to keep my head afloat in an economy that doesn’t appear to put much value on my hard work.  He gets the gist of how I work so hard, what the challenges are like, and the kinds of things our government could do that would make me feel more like I was getting a decent shake at the American dream. 

But that’s not all.  He has spoken against the war in Iraq all along.  Today he proposed a date by which we should have our military out of there.  The crowd was quiet.  Not me.  I was whooping and hollering.  But I was one of ten thousand, and went unnoticed except by the people right around me.  And then he described how we must take care of all our returning vets, and the entire crowd was whooping and hollering.  He proposed that we bring unions back into power enough to take care of laborers.  He proposed that we give teachers the resources and money they deserve.  He proposed that we make college education more affordable, and there was an ocean of approval moving all around the lawn.  The twenty-somethings and the fifty-somethings are in complete agreement about this one!  And he spoke to us as a generation.  Not separate generations in clusters; but as though we in the audience were all one generation:  the generation who can step up to the plate, roll up our sleeves and fix what’s wrong with today’s government.  Dad’s held little kids up on their shoulders to see the sight.  We felt a part of history at that moment.  Not because of the event that happened, but because of the shared vision of events to come, events that we believe will come because of our commitment, our work ethic, our diversified talents, and our connection to this gangly attorney who is determined to do things differently if we choose to elect him. 

And it isn’t just that he seems so sincere when he flashes that brilliant smile, and it isn’t just that he is a powerful speaker, and it isn’t just that he speaks to us of our own stories.  The guy’s an expert on Constitutional Law who said that the battle we need to fight is making Washington DC work differently.  This at a time when the war abroad is an incredible, unbearable travesty and I get the feeling we are being distracted from an wicked attempt to undermine our Constitution.  The job description of president is to uphold the constitution. Would it be good for our next president to be a Constitutional expert?  I just don’t get why there’s any question of nominating anyone else.  This is to me as clear as a postcard perfect clear sky day at 3 degrees Fahrenheit.  Barack is my guy.  There is not much I would change about today’s rally if I could.  It would have been nice to get those autographs, though.

--CAROLYN QUINN


Unitarian Sage James Luther Adams Predicted Rise of Religious Right.
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin

Chris Hedges                                JLA
              Chris Hedges                                           James Luther Adams

CHRIS HEDGES is an award winning foreign correspondent with impeccable credentials.  But he may be best known for the headlines he made in May of 2003 when he was commencement speaker at conservative ROCKFORD COLLEGE in Illinois. Recently returned from Iraq, the speech was a blistering denunciation of the war and astonishingly prescient in its projections for a dismal result.  Hedges was booed and jeered in what some observers reported was a near riot.  He persevered and delivered the speech anyway.  A national examination of freedom of speech and academic freedom followed the well publicized address.

 He followed up this experience with publishing WAR IS A FORCE THAT GIVES US MEANING, drawing on his decades of experience as a war coorespondent. 

But Hedges also was drawn to examine the rise of the religious right in America.  The son of a Presbyterian minister, he was a young student at HARVARD DIVINITY SCHOOL, where he studied under JAMES LUTHER ADAMS.  Adams gave him the intelectual tools, compounded by real world experience to analize the growing threat.


Although largely unknown to the public JAMES LUTHER ADAMS is commonaly regarded as the greatest Unitarian theologian of the 20th Century.  Studying in Germany during the rise of the Nazis, he advocated a rigourous, grounded religious humanism that could rise above empty platitudes and individual self-absorbtion to be a postitive force for good in the world.  He secretly filmed members of the anti-nazi underground CONFESSING CHURCH including KARL BARTH and ALBERT SCHWEITZERr, as well as Nazi apologists in the state sanctioned church.  Escaping the Gestapo by guile with the films, he returned to the states to sound a warning to both the nation and to complacent religious liberals.  Later also translated and intorduced to the American public the important German liberal theologians, including PAUL TILLICH.

In January Hedges published his new examination of the religious right, AMERICAN FACSISTS: THE CHRISTIAN RIGHT AND THE WAR ON AMERICA.  

In an essay first published in TRUTHDIG and which I read in TRUTHOUT.ORG, Hedges explains the importance of Adams in the development of his critique. The article is so important, I have elected to reproduce it in its entreaty below.

Christianists on the March
    By Chris Hedges
    Truthdig

 Dr. James Luther Adams, my ethics professor at Harvard Divinity School, told his students that when we were his age - he was then close to 80 - we would all be fighting the "Christian fascists."

The warning, given 25 years ago, came at the moment Pat Robertson and other radio and television evangelists began speaking about a new political religion that would direct its efforts toward taking control of all institutions, including mainstream denominations and the government. Its stated goal was to use the United States to create a global Christian empire. This call for fundamentalists and evangelicals to take political power was a radical and ominous mutation of traditional Christianity. It was hard, at the time, to take such fantastic rhetoric seriously, especially given the buffoonish quality of those who expounded it. But Adams warned us against the blindness caused by intellectual snobbery. The Nazis, he said, were not going to return with swastikas and brown shirts. Their ideological inheritors had found a mask for fascism in the pages of THE BIBLE.

He was not a man to use the word fascist lightly. He had been in Germany in 1935 and 1936 and worked with the underground anti-Nazi church, known as the Confessing Church, led by Dietrich Bonhoeffer. Adams was eventually detained and interrogated by the Gestapo, who suggested he might want to consider returning to the United States. It was a suggestion he followed. He left on a night train with framed portraits of Adolf Hitler placed over the contents of his suitcases to hide the rolls of home-movie film he had taken of the so-called German Christian Church, which was pro-Nazi, and the few individuals who defied the Nazis, including the theologians Karl Barth and Albert Schweitzer. The ruse worked when the border police lifted the tops of the suitcases, saw the portraits of the Führer and closed them up again. I watched hours of the grainy black-and-white films as he narrated in his apartment in Cambridge

Adams understood that totalitarian movements are built out of deep personal and economic despair. He warned that the flight of manufacturing jobs, the impoverishment of the American working class, the physical obliteration of communities in the vast, soulless exurbs and decaying Rust Belt, were swiftly deforming our society. The current assault on the middle class, which now lives in a world in which anything that can be put on software can be outsourced, would have terrified him.

The stories that many in this movement told me over the past two years as I worked on AMERICAN FASCISTS: THE CHRISTIAN RIGHT AND THE WAR ON AMERICA were stories of this failure - personal, communal and often economic. This despair, Adams said, would empower dangerous dreamers - those who today bombard the airwaves with an idealistic and religious utopianism that promises, through violent apocalyptic purification, to eradicate the old, sinful world that has failed many Americans.

These Christian utopians promise to replace this internal and external emptiness with a mythical world where time stops and all problems are solved. The mounting despair rippling across the United States, one I witnessed repeatedly as I traveled the country, remains unaddressed by the Democratic Party, which has abandoned the working class, like its Republican counterpart, for massive corporate funding. The Christian right has lured tens of millions of Americans, who rightly feel abandoned and betrayed by the political system, from the reality-based world to one of magic - to fantastic visions of angels and miracles, to a childlike belief that God has a plan for them and Jesus will guide and protect them. This mythological worldview, one that has no use for science or dispassionate, honest intellectual inquiry, one that promises that the loss of jobs and health insurance does not matter, as long as you are right with Jesus, offers a lying world of consistency that addresses the emotional yearnings of desperate followers at the expense of reality. It creates a world where facts become interchangeable with opinions, where lies become true - the very essence of the totalitarian state. It includes a dark license to kill, to obliterate all those who do not conform to this vision, from Muslims in the Middle East to those at home who refuse to submit to the movement.

And it conveniently empowers a rapacious oligarchy whose god is maximum profit at the expense of citizens. We now live in a nation where the top 1 percent control more wealth than the bottom 90 percent combined, where we have legalized torture and can lock up citizens without trial. Arthur Schlesinger, in THE CYCLES OF AMERICAN HISTORY, wrote that "the great religious ages were notable for their indifference to human rights in the contemporary sense - not only for their acquiescence in poverty, inequality and oppression, but for their enthusiastic justification of slavery, persecution, torture and genocide."

 Adams saw in the Christian right, long before we did, disturbing similarities with the German Christian Church and the Nazi Party, similarities that he said would, in the event of prolonged social instability or a national crisis, see American fascists rise under the guise of religion to dismantle the open society. He despaired of U.S. liberals, who, he said, as in Nazi Germany, mouthed silly platitudes about dialogue and inclusiveness that made them ineffectual and impotent. Liberals, he said, did not understand the power and allure of evil or the cold reality of how the world worked. The current hand-wringing by Democrats, with many asking how they can reach out to a movement whose leaders brand them "demonic" and "satanic," would not have surprised Adams. Like Bonhoeffer, he did not believe that those who would fight effectively in coming times of turmoil, a fight that for him was an integral part of the biblical message, would come from the church or the liberal, secular elite.

His critique of the prominent research universities, along with the media, was no less withering. These institutions, self-absorbed, compromised by their close relationship with government and corporations, given enough of the pie to be complacent, were unwilling to deal with the fundamental moral questions and inequities of the age. They had no stomach for a battle that might cost them their prestige and comfort. He told me, I suspect half in jest, that if the Nazis took over America "60 percent of the Harvard faculty would begin their lectures with the Nazi salute." But this too was not an abstraction. He had watched academics at the University of Heidelberg, including the philosopher Martin Heidegger, raise their arms stiffly to students before class.

 Two decades later, even in the face of the growing reach of the Christian right, his prediction seems apocalyptic. And yet the powerbrokers in the Christian right have moved from the fringes of society to the floor of the House of Representatives and the Senate. Forty-five senators and 186 members of the House before the last elections earned approval ratings of 80 to100 percent from the three most influential Christian right advocacy groups - the Christian Coalition, Eagle Forum, and Family Resource Council.

President Bush has handed hundreds of millions of dollars in federal aid to these groups and dismantled federal programs in science, reproductive rights and AIDS research to pay homage to the pseudo-science and quackery of the Christian right. Bush will, I suspect, turn out to be no more than a weak transition figure, our version of Otto von Bismarck - who also used "values" to energize his base at the end of the 19th century and launched "Kulturkampf," the word from which we get culture wars, against Catholics and Jews. Bismarck's attacks, which split Germany and made the discrediting of whole segments of the society an acceptable part of the civil discourse, paved the way for the Nazis' more virulent racism and repression.

The radical Christian right, calling for a "Christian state" - where whole segments of American society, from gays and lesbians to liberals to immigrants to artists to intellectuals, will have no legitimacy and be reduced, at best, to second-class citizens - awaits a crisis, an economic meltdown, another catastrophic terrorist strike or a series of environmental disasters. A period of instability will permit them to push through their radical agenda, one that will be sold to a frightened American public as a return to security and law and order, as well as moral purity and prosperity. This movement - the most dangerous mass movement in American history - will not be blunted until the growing social and economic inequities that blight this nation are addressed, until tens of millions of Americans, now locked in hermetic systems of indoctrination through Christian television and radio, as well as Christian schools, are reincorporated into American society and given a future, one with hope, adequate wages, job security and generous federal and state assistance. The unchecked rape of America, which continues with the blessing of both political parties, heralds not only the empowerment of this American oligarchy but the eventual death of the democratic state and birth of American fascism.



 


Home