"Heretic, Rebel, a Thing to Flout"

An Eclectic Journal of Opinion, Poetry, and General Bloviating


Viral Activism Hits Facebook
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin

Yesterday morning I noted a message from a Facebook friend that:


No one should die because they cannot afford health care, and no one should go broke because they get sick. If you agree, please post this as your status for the rest of the day.


In the next couple of hours the same message popped up from other friends, many of whom were not directly connected.  I updated my status.  All through the afternoon more and more friends were doing the same.  These folks included the usual political types and included many of liberally inclined Unitarian Universalist acquaintances, but also just a cross section of folks I have known over a long life.


There were many positive comments to the posts, and “likes.”  Of course there were a few negative comments, some of them quite harsh and paranoid.  But they were overwhelmed by a wave of out-of-no-where grass roots activism.


The phenomenon was not limited to my small circle.  It was sweeping Facebook and Twitter as well.  It got noticed—by
Time.com, MyDD, WireTap Blog among others.  Even President Barack Obama’s own Facebook Page gratefully acknowledged the swell of support.  At my last visit to his page his entry had generated 72,791 “likes” and 6,970 comments.


Yet this did not originate with him or
Organizing for America, issue advocacy groups like Health Care for America NOW!, or the vast activist network of MoveOn.Org, although participants in all of those are undoubtedly involved.  No one has yet identified the first post.  But it has spread on its own simple power.


People are tired of the screaming, lying and bullying, and of the vacillations in Congress and in the White House.  They want their voices heard.  And in this simple, dramatic way they have—if only for a moment—drowned out rants of Faux News, the Orwellian double speak of insurance industry shills, the obstructionism of the incredible shrinking Republican Party.


Good for us.


My E-mail to Roland Burris
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin


Senator Burris—

You probably don’t remember me.  We have met three or four times at political events. I believe Paul Simon introduced us the first time. About three years ago we even had a nice conversation at Governor’s Day at the State Fair.  I am an active Democrat, currently Secretary of the McHenry County Party, and was proud to support your previous state-wide campaigns.  

I was critical of the way you came into office in the Senate, but I have never been a "Burris hater."

And I had every confidence that on the most critical issue you will face in your brief Senate career that I, and the people of Illinois, could count on you to stand fearlessly with our President and with Senator Durbin for strong, comprehensive health care reform that includes a public option.  I felt so confident that I did not pester you with e-mails, phone calls and letters as I have other officials.

Now, to my great disappointment, it seems I may be wrong.

I was astonished to find your name among the Freshman Democrats rallying to the side of Senator Baucus and his obstructionism in the Senate Finance Committee.  Baucus claims to be working with Republicans on a "compromise." But the Republicans are not interested in compromise, only in killing reform. Instead Baucus, heavily in debt to lavish support from the insurance industry, has made it clear that he wants to hold out against a public option in favor of some smoke and mirrors  illusion that will preserve insurance profits while cheating the American people out of the best—and most affordable—option available.

I am ashamed of you.  For the sake of the legacy you seem to treasure, redeem your reputation by withdrawing your support from this stab-in-the-back and forthrightly state your full support for real healthcare reform.

Patrick Murfin

 


Madigan’s Demur Sets Up Illinois Scramble
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin

Folks here in Illinois are still shaking their heads over the announcement by popular Attorney General Lisa Madigan that she will not be running for Governor or Senate.  She was the dam behind which a river of ambitious Democrats were contained.  They all hoped that she would open the floodgates to advancement by declaring for higher office.  Boy, were they disappointed.

 

Most observers were convinced until recently that Madigan would follow the fondest dreams of her father, Speaker of the House and Illinois Democratic Party Chair Michael Madigan and run for governor.  Meanwhile she was the open choice of the White House and Rahm Emanuel to make the run for Barack Obama’s old Senate seat against terminally damaged Blagojevich appointee Roland Burris.

 

Instead the diminutive and youthful Madigan announced that she would “stay in the job I love” and run for a third term.  The mother of two small children ages 1 and 4, her claim of family commitments have plausibility.  And she is certainly young enough to have chances for advancement in the future.  Likely those chances looked better to her than the murky waters she faced in the wake of scandal and budget melt down that have tainted the prospects of Illinois Democrats despite an ever widening advantage in voter registration, a wildly popular home town hero as President, and the perennial shoot-themselves-in-the-foot mopery of state Republicans.

 

Whether it was secret polling or shrewd political instincts, Madigan opted for safety.  Here is a score card of some of the players scrambling for position in the wake of Madigan’s decision.

 

For Senate:

 

Roland Burris was on everybody’s short list as an immediate lame duck—make that dead duck—unable to wash off the stench of his appointment.  Indeed a continual water-torture drip of new revelations indicate that the Freshman Senator was even less forthcoming about his solicitation of the former disgraced governor and his top aids than previously disclosed.  But Burris is a proud—some say arrogant—man.  Despite hints that he would be satisfied with a “career toper” appointment, he had indicated that he may run for re-election.  But today reports are circulating that he will announce Friday that he is out of the race but will finish his term.  He doesn’t have any money and likely can’t raise much.  But if a Democratic Primary field had gotten crowed and he could paint attempts to oust him as racial, he might have squeaked by on the basis of big turn outs by African Americans.  He would then have been creamed by almost any warm body the Republicans could put up.

 

State Treasurer Alexi Giannoulis is now the consensus front runner.  He has a lot going for him, including proven vote getting skills.  Even younger than Madigan, Giannoulis has strong personal and political ties to Obama and might be expecting covert help from the White House now that Madigan is out of the picture.  But President and his operatives might conclude that the Illinois race is too toxic to become involved in, particularly if race becomes an issue.  Giannoulis is a charismatic candidate and great campaigner.  He can raise serious money, particularly from the large—and generous—Greek community.  He has been courting progressives with things like his support for workers at Hartmarx and blogging on the Daily Kos.  On the negative side there have been a few bumps that could be made into mountains during his term as Treasurer and there have been questions of how deep his personal involvement in his father’s suspect banking operations might be.

 

Christopher (Chris) Kennedy, the eighth of Bobby Kennedy’s many children has let it be known that he is interested in the race.  Outside of his name and family connections, he is largely unknown in the state despite managing his family’s Merchandise Mart in Chicago for a number of years.  He has a modest reputation as a promoter of “green business” practices.  Despite presumed participation in the city’s high level social life, it is hard even to find a news photo of the presumptive candidate or statements on public issues.  Still, he can raise a ton of money quickly and can presumably bring his illustrious family to his aid.  He may hope that the President’s deep political debt to the Kennedy clan for their support at a critical juncture in his race for the nomination might effectively check Giannoulis’s personal connections.  Some believe that he may enjoy the quiet support of Mayor Richard M. Daily, although no public commitment has been made.  On the downside, word of his likely candidacy has stirred up zero enthusiasm among rank-and-file party members and activists and cousin Caroline’s fate in New York is evidence that plenty of folks are unwilling to automatically swallow a cipher wrapped in the Kennedy mantle.

 

Many Black politicians fervently wished for an alternative to Burris. Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. thought he could be the one.  But he has been caught up in the Blagojevich soap opera and his wife, Chicago Alderman Sandi Jackson, has also been ensnared in that mess and has been criticized for being paid large sums under her maiden name for services to her husband’s congressional campaign.  Jackson can’t even count on the unified support of Chicago black politicians.  He has a long running feud with some powerful aldermen and ward committeemen.  Like Giannoulis and Madigan, he has a long personal and political relationship with the President, but may have jeopardized that with grousing about Obama not getting behind him in his feverish drive to convince Blagojevich to appoint him to the Senate.  No other major Black political figure had been willing to enter the race until Burris’ withdrawal.  Now to challenge Burris a scramble to put forth a serious Black candidate will begin.  Congressman Danny Davis might think of a run, as could any number of Chicago Aldermen and state legislators.  Obama might even prevail on his aid Valerie Jarrett, who withdrew from consideration by Blagojevich when word got out that Obama was pushing her candidacy, to enter the race.

 

On the Republican side Rep. Mark Kirk, who announced his candidacy as Madigan was renouncing hers is the Great White Hope of the Republican establishment.  He has an undeserved reputation as a moderate and “maverick” based almost exclusively on his support of environmental causes.  He has won twice in his increasingly Democratic North Shore Congressional seat.  He is photogenic and well spoken, the darling of the local media.  National Republicans are prepared to pump megabucks into his campaign in order to embarrass the President and steal what should be a safe Democratic seat from a deep blue state.  And he is the kind of non-ideological “moderate” Republican that Illinois voters have supported in the past.  He would be the toughest possible Republican to beat in a General Election.  The trouble is, he may never get a chance to make the race.  He is despised by the conservative base for lack of purity and fire.  Many would rather loose the race than elevate a “Republocrat.”  Several pipsqueak lock-and-load right-wingers are eyeing the primary, along with a few “respectable” but obscure state legislators.  If enough of them stay in the race the famous GOP circular firing squad will take care of them and let Kirk seize the nomination.  But if the kids can stop squabbling amongst themselves and unite around a single candidate—particularly one rich enough to self finance his campaign, Kirk might never make it to the big dance.

 

For Governor:

 

Governor Patrick Quinn would be the happiest man in Illinois today if he wasn’t wrestling with a confrontation with the Democratic Legislature over the budget crisis, which threatens to shut down state government and “gut the entire social services safety net” in the middle of a Depression.  Certainly his path to winning re-nomination is smoother even if his chances in November are dicey.  Quinn, a career “reformer”, earnest as a Boy Scout, honest as ol’ Abe himself, was seen as a breath of fresh air following the Blago nightmare.  But the honeymoon was short lived.  With the oratorical skills of a middle school social studies teacher and the charisma of a boiled potato, the new Governor is clearly out of his depth.  His proposed reforms of tainted campaign fiancé laws—among the loosest in the nation—have largely gone no where in the General Assembly and have alienated go-along-get-along politicians of both parties.  His proposed 50% increase in the state income tax was greeted unabashed glee by Republicans and abject terror by Democrats.  His announced slashing of social services funding has been universally denounced as “hold people hostage” and has already decimated programs and agencies around the state.  Now he has announced massive State Government lay-offs in a 1$ billion slash to state operating funds that will result in more than 2,500 layoffs.  Neither of these actions have moved the deadlocked legislature.  He has his held up a long awaited capital infrastructure plan that is chock-full of road and other projects backed up for years and which would be a powerful “jobs and stimulus” tonic to the state economy saying that he will not allow bonded road building to go forward without a budget.  Although Quinn is not without his supporters and admirers, they can’t break the logjam in the legislature.  They also can’t raise much money.  And Quinn’s own attempts to raise a war chest have been mocked for failing to uphold the lofty promises of reform that have been is career signature.  He is damned if he does and damned if he doesn’t.  Now he has a shot at winning a contested primary, but Republicans lie in the weeds eager to tie him to Blagojevich and to Democratic majorities in both houses that can’t seem to do their jobs.

 

Without Madigan in the game, there is no clear alternative to Quinn.  Perhaps State Comptroller Dan Hynes could step up.  He had been planning to run for Madigan’s job.  But she is staying put and not being suicidal he can’t challenge her.  Hynes has been increasingly critical of both the Governor and the General Assembly.  He has a power base in the Cook County organization.  He could presumably shift gears and emerge as a credible alternative.  Others are now undoubtedly testing the waters, but the rumor mill has not produced any names likely to inspire great enthusiasm.

 

Fortunately for Democrats the Republican race is crowed by midgets and whats-his-names.  Among the announced or expected luminaries to throw their hats in the ring are DuPage County Board Chairman Bob Schillerstrom, hardly a household word, and a slew of state house denizens including Sen. Matt Murphy of Palatine, Sen. Bill Brady of Bloomington, and Sen. Kirk Dillard of Hinsdale, the best known among them.  Others in the race are the usual GOP gadfly/nut job types, “pundit” Dan Proft and Adam Andrzejewski, whose ambition seems to be challenging Blagojevich for the most unpronounceable name in politics.  All of these will have to dive to the far right to try to win the Republican nomination.  And they will pound each other with relentless negative advertising.  The emerging candidate will be so bloodied and discredited that even Pat Quinn might survive.

 

Down Ticket:

 

A bunch of folks looked to move up the ladder by claiming Lisa Madigan’s job.  We have already noted Hynes, but at least he has the reasonable option of running for governor.  State Rep. Julie Hamos has been running around the state for nearly a year trying to line up support for a statewide race, presumably Attorney General.  She now needs to weigh her options.  Staying in the Senate appears to be out as she has already announced that she would not seek re-election.  She could seek Giannoulis’ job—or Hynes’ if he opts to run for governor.  Some say that even the chief executive job or the Senate seat are possibilities, but I don’t think she has the name recognition or the fund raising oomph for either of those.

 

McHenry County’s own State Representative Jack Franks has also been laying the groundwork for a run at Attorney General.  Franks got plenty of state wide and even national attention as the most relentless of Blagojevich’s many critics.  He has carved out a safe seat in traditionally Republican territory and has held it election after election by virtue of an outstanding ground operation and superb constituent service,  He tested the waters for a possible run against Blago four years ago but demurred to the Governor’s overwhelming fundraising prowess.  He, like Hamos, could try for one of the open constitutional officer seats.  His family has banking interests, so perhaps Treasurer or Comptroller is not out of the question.  Perhaps he could convince his self-proclaimed buddy, popular Secretary of State Jesse White that it is time to retire.  The Secretary of State job has been a historic launching pad for the Governorship.  But it is unlikely that Franks could realistically try for Governor or Senate.  As the most conservative Democrat in the General Assembly, Franks is not apt to generate much enthusiasm in Chicago or even the closer-in suburbs.  He decision to bail out of his commitment to Obama and endorse Hillary Clinton is a political mistake he probably already regrets.  David Axelrod and Emanuel have long memories even if the President is more forgiving.  They are in a position to crush his aspirations if they get too big.  The other problem is that Franks is something of a technophobe.  He has never even maintained a campaign web site or used TV.  He has always been about a shoe leather ground game.  That won’t be enough in a state wide race.  If stymied, Franks, unlike Hamos, can retreat to an absolutely safe seat.

 

Who is the biggest loser in all of this?  Hands down it is the hapless Joe Birkett.  The Dupage County State’s Attorney announced a second bid for Attorney General just before Madigan’s announcement believing he would be going for an open seat.  Madigan crushed Birkett in her first run and he was on the ticket for Lt. Governor in 2006.  Madigan has grown in both stature and popularity as is absolutely unbeatable as an incumbent.  Birkett does not even have the option of re-evaluating and maybe running for Governor because he can’t even count on the united support of the powerful Dupage County COP machine with two other local county politcos already in the race.

 

“May you live in interesting times,” is an ancient Chinese curse.  And these indeed are interesting times for Illinois Democrats.


My Franklin
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin


Over at The Chalice Blog Chalice Chick shares a marvelous photo that she took on the sly of a copy of Jean-Antoine Houdon's bust of Benjamin Franklin at a museum in Toledo, Ohio.

 

I will see C.C. one Franklin and raise her one from my very own “collection.”

 

As you can tell, my bust owes a significant debt to Houdon.  If more than 200 years had not elapsed, perhaps the artist might have a copyright claim.  My Franklin began life as a Bi-Centennial Avon Deep Woods Aftershave bottle.  Pop off Franklin’s head and smelly stuff once flowed.  The old man himself probably would have approved with amusement.  His image adorned all manner of things, including the bottoms of chamber pots, during the French popular mania for the good doctor.

 

Actually, Ben is part of a matched set.  On the other end of this particular bookshelf in my study sits George Washington.  I picked the both of them up a few years ago for a couple of dollars at one of those “antique stores” that are really junk collections in old garages.

 

They are both part of a minor collection of figures from American History that clutter and literally collect dust in my chaotic study, much to the dismay of my long suffering wife.  My little Jefferson bust resembles those piano top composers awarded to diligent students in my youth.  A barely recognizable bronze Franklin Roosevelt doubles as pencil sharpener.  Lincoln in painted and chipped plaster is the largest of the sculptures.  He sits on a corner niche shelf over my left shoulder as I type.

 

My crowed walls continue the theme.  There is Jefferson again in a small picture as a youthful red head that once served as a table decoration at a political diner.  There is also a nice calendar-like shot of his monument illuminated at dusk.  Jefferson and Franklin are united with John Adams, Robert Livingston, and John Hancock on a low quality plate commemorating the presentation of the Declaration of Independence to the Continental Congress.  FDR gets better treatment in a handsome poster brought home from his Memorial in Washington.  A glance around the room will also reveal, in no particular order, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Mother Jones, Martin Luther King, Joe Hill, nearly forgotten Illinois poet Vachel Lindsay, Eugene V. Debs, and a small poster of assorted portraits called Lincoln Through the Ages.  Jesus makes an appearance in a woodcut standing with a bunch of shabby men in what appears to be a soup line.  We’ll make him an honorary American given the context.  Oh yeah, and there is a Senate campaign poster of a youthful Barack Obama and an Obama commemorative calendar I got as a Christmas present last year.

 

Scattered among them all are framed quotes from William Ellery Channing, Edwin Markham (the little poem from which this blog takes its name,) Mark Twain, Nelson Algren, John Adams, Walt Whitman, and Alfred E. Newman.  There are also copies of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.

 

All in all, it is a decorator’s nightmare.

 

But having these folks around me in the dead of night as I madly type away at this or that project is both comforting and challenging.  They help keep me reasonably honest.

 


Time to Move on Health Care
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin



I have long been a passionate supporter of a single payer national health plan as advocated by Healthcare Now!.  I continue to be one.  And I will do everything in my power to make sure the single payer option is fully discussed by Congress.  Recent events have shown that public opinion is moving in this direction despite the timidity of many Democrats in Congress.  Maybe a tsunami of pubic support can move the mountain.

 

But despite the Healthcare Now! slogan, “Because Nothing Less Will Do,” I am not willing to cut off my nose to spite my face if we can’t swallow the whole pie now.  The health care crisis in this nation is too critical. We need to make sure that any health care reform includes a critical public option. Which is why I am also throwing my full support to Organizing for America’s Health Care Action Center. 

President Obama has called for health care reform in 2009 that upholds three core principles. It must:

  • Reduce costs — Rising health care costs are crushing the budgets of governments, businesses, individuals, and families, and they must be brought under control.
  • Guarantee choice — Every American must have the freedom to choose their plan and doctor – including the choice of a public insurance option.
  • Ensure quality care for all — All Americans must have quality and affordable health care.

 

Folks, the manure is about to hit the rotating ventilation device.  The powerful forces of those who reap huge rewards from the current inequitable system, the ideologues and the fear mongers are united in doing everything in their power to block true reform and to sow confusion and division among Democrats, progressives, and the rightfully concerned public.

 

Stand with the President and Sign the Declaration of Support.  Call your Congressman and Senators.  Sign up to host or attend an event in your community.  Write a letter to the editor.  Don’t just stand there!  Do something!  Now!


Sign MoveOn’s Clean Energy Petition
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin

MoveOn dropped me an e-mail asking me to post this on my blog.  Fair enough.  A complete re-prioritization of American energy policy is key to our economic recovery in the short run and our survival on this planet in the long.

 

It's 2009. Democrats have ample majorities in both houses of Congress. President Obama campaigned on the promise to tackle climate change and boost our economy by investing in clean energy.


So why on earth is Congress considering an energy bill that:

  • Would weaken current law, repealing President Obama's authority to crack down on dirty power plants, and
  • Doesn't actually require the creation of new solar or wind power? (The Union of Concerned Scientists has concluded that the clean energy standards won't make power companies produce more clean energy than is already in the works.)

Why? Because Big Oil and Coal have teamed up with conservatives in both parties, and they've been successful in weakening the bill.

These are major flaws, but the bill has a lot of really good provisions, too. The key thing is that Congress can still strengthen it—if there's a public outcry. But we don't have much time: Congress is expected to vote on this bill in less than three weeks.


Can you sign this petition to Representative Donald Manzullo today? Eighty thousand MoveOn members have already signed. We need to double the number of signatures by Wednesday—that means we need 10 more signatures in Crystal Lake. MoveOn members will personally deliver this petition to many congressional offices the next day. Click here to add your name:


http://pol.moveon.org/cleanenergy/o.pl?id=16315-3430421-yY2.Vnx&t=4


The petition says: "We need a stronger energy bill to fulfill Obama's vision of a clean energy economy. Congress should strengthen the clean energy standards and restore Obama's authority to crack down on dirty coal plants." 


Congress must change the energy bill to require power companies to produce more clean energy for America. Wind and solar create more than twice as many jobs as coal and oil. And Congress needs to hold polluters accountable by restoring President Obama's current authority through the EPA to crack down on global warming pollution from power plants.


The Union of Concerned Scientists analysis finds that the current version of the clean energy standard "won't require utilities to use any more renewable electricity than...would be generated as a result of state renewable electricity standards already in place and the recently enacted stimulus package."
 

If we just sit back, we'll miss our chance to go big with wind and solar—and we'll lose the jobs those industries would create. Big Oil and Coal will keep getting billions of dollars in taxpayer subsidies. And President Obama will be powerless to stop more than 100 new dirty coal plants, which will crowd out the clean energy growth we need to boost our economy.


There are some good parts of the bill, but these are significant problems. As the Sierra Club's Carl Pope writes, the bill establishes strong long-term goals for cutting carbon pollution and very strong energy-efficiency investments, "but in its present form, it won't do all that's needed. The oil, coal, and dirty-utility interests...were able to prevent enactment of President Obama's much bolder vision...Yes, they will try to kill the green-jobs recovery in its cradle, and yes, they will try to block our clean-energy future."


Please urge Rep. Manzullo to fight for a stronger energy bill. Clicking here will add your name to the petition:


http://pol.moveon.org/cleanenergy/o.pl?id=16315-3430421-yY2.Vnx&t=5


Thanks for all you do.

Anna, Michael, Joan, Noah and the rest of the team


Sources:

1. Bill Needs Strengthening to Guarantee Necessary Carbon Reductions, New Green Jobs and Consumer Benefits, Science Group Says, Union of Concerned Scientists, May 14, 2009 http://www.moveon.org/r?r=51475&id=16315-3430421-yY2.Vnx&t=6


2. EPA urged to act on climate, not wait for Congress, Associated Press, May 18, 2009 http://www.moveon.org/r?r=51479&id=16315-3430421-yY2.Vnx&t=7

3. American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009, Library of Congress, May 15, 2009 http://www.moveon.org/r?r=51482&id=16315-3430421-yY2.Vnx&t=8


4. Green Recovery: A Program to Create Good Jobs and Start Building a Low-Carbon Economy, Political Economy Research Institute at the University of Massachusetts-Amherst, September 2008
http://www.peri.umass.edu/green_recovery/


5. Stopping the Coal Rush, Sierra Club

http://www.moveon.org/r?r=51483&id=16315-3430421-yY2.Vnx&t=10


6. So How Good Is This Climate Bill, Anyhow? Sierra Club, May 22, 2009
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=51478&id=16315-3430421-yY2.Vnx&t=11

 


DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR.--In His Own Words
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin
 

In honor of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.  and the peculiar congruency of the stars that has matched his dream with the triumph of hope represented by Barack Obama, here are some of his memorable words.

 

Freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed.

 

Change does not roll in on the wheels of inevitability, but comes through continuous struggle. And so we must straighten our backs and work for our freedom. A man can't ride you unless your back is bent.

 

Every man must decide whether he will walk in the light of creative altruism or in the darkness of destructive selfishness.

 

Have we not come to such an impasse in the modern world that we must love our enemies - or else? The chain reaction of evil - hate begetting hate, wars producing more wars - must be broken, or else we shall be plunged into the dark abyss of annihilation.

 

History will have to record that the greatest tragedy of this period of social transition was not the strident clamor of the bad people, but the appalling silence of the good people.

 

Human progress is neither automatic nor inevitable... Every step toward the goal of justice requires sacrifice, suffering, and struggle; the tireless exertions and passionate concern of dedicated individuals.

 

I have decided to stick with love. Hate is too great a burden to bear.

 

I submit to you that if a man hasn't discovered something that he will die for, he isn't fit to live.

 

It may be true that the law cannot make a man love me, but it can keep him from lynching me, and I think that's pretty important.

 

Philanthropy is commendable, but it must not cause the philanthropist to overlook the circumstances of economic injustice which make philanthropy necessary.

 

Property is intended to serve life, and no matter how much we surround it with rights and respect, it has no personal being. It is part of the earth man walks on. It is not man.

 

That old law about 'an eye for an eye' leaves everybody blind. The time is always right to do the right thing.

 

The hottest place in Hell is reserved for those who remain neutral in times of great moral conflict.

The past is prophetic in that it asserts loudly that wars are poor chisels for carving out peaceful tomorrows.

 

We are not makers of history. We are made by history.

 

When you are right you cannot be too radical; when you are wrong, you cannot be too conservative.


OBAMA'S CHRISTMAS MESSAGE AND THE BATTLE OF TRENTON
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin



This sketch captures the Crossing of the Delaware better than the famous—and famously inaccurate—painting by Emanuel Leutze.


This contemporary painting shows Continental troops overwhelming the Hessians in Trenton.

Barack Obama, ever the history buff, in his Christmas address to the nation cited George Washington’s daring raid against Hessian troops Trenton, New Jersey.

 

232 years ago, when America was newly born as a nation, George Washington an his Army faced impossible odds as they struggled to free themselves from the grip of an empire.

 

It was Christmas Day—December 25th, 1776—that they fought through ice and cold to make an improbable crossing of the Delaware River.  They caught the enemy off guard, won victories in Trenton and Princeton, and gave new momentum to the beleaguered Army and new hope to the cause of Independence.

 

Many ages have passed since that first American Christmas.  We have crossed many rivers as a people.  But the lessons that have carried us through are the same lessons that we celebrate every Christmas season—the same lessons that guide us to this very day:  that hope endures, and that a new birth of peace is always possible.

 

It may seem odd, even inappropriate, to conjure up an image of war—and an ugly, brutal war at that—to mark the holiday that celebrate “Peace on Earth, goodwill to men.”  Yet much of America, itself in the midst of another brutal winter and in an economic darkness every bit as gloomy as the grim winter of 1776 when Continental moral was shattered; the Army beggared, beleaguered, and nearly broken; and Independence a fading dream.  

 

The battle was celebrated in David McCullough’s masterful history 1776, a book which was as surely was on Obama’s night stand as A Team of Rivals.  McCullough described in detail the ravage condition of the Army, Washington’s brilliant but daring gamble and the brutal conditions in which the attack was carried out.

 

Particularly important was the role of the Marblehead Regiment under the command of John Glover.  Composed mainly of hardened fishermen from Marblehead, Massachusetts and other nearby seaports, the regiment was raised as militia and participated in the Siege of Boston under the command of General Artemas Ward.  When Washington arrived on the scene to take command the men mustered into the new Continental Army as the 14th Regiment.  

 

After the disastrous defeat of the Battle of Long Island, the Marblehead men saved the army by evacuating it across the East River in what was considered a virtual military miracle.

 

There is something particularly appealing in the notion that at two critical moments in the War for Independence, it was those tough, hard working fishermen who saved the day.  They were working class heroes of the Revolution.

 

When we remember them today with the President Elect, let’s not forget the working men and women of today who will be called on for equally heroic duty in the days ahead.

 

 

 


BLAGOJEVICH!--Why it Sounds Like Puking in Your Hat
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin

Blagojevich in an uncharacteristic moment of self-reflection.

To no one’s surprise Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich returned to work this morning after being sprung on signature bond from his arrest yesterday on a dazzling array of corruption charges.  After all, about the only leverage he has left is his job and the threat that he will fill the Senate seat in a way that does the maximum political damage to his legions of enemies.  

 

Politicians are scrambling to find ways to strip that authority from him before he pulls the pin on the grenade.  Lt. Governor Pat Quinn—AKA Governor-in-waiting—started the ball rolling at a press conference yesterday in which he called for Blagojevich to temporarily step aside due to being “impeded from fulfilling the duties of his office.”  He broached this option on his assumption that the Governor would never voluntarily resign.  Pressed repeatedly by reporters, he amended his recommendation to include “or resign,” which ended up as the sound bite on the evening news.  He also suggested that if the governor did not remove himself in some way, the legislature should act immediately to strip him of his power to appoint a Senator. 

 

Quinn, by the way, is a notorious goo-goo—that’s the derisive term for “good government” in Illinois politics—so far removed from the Governor’s taint that he reportedly hasn’t even spoken to him since the summer of 2007.  Quinn’s only real faults are a tendency to pomposity and self-congratulation at his own virtues. He stands out as a rumpled but shining contrast to the incumbent.  He declared himself ready to assume office if need be.

 

Senator Dick Durbin, himself recently burned by nearly unanimous public revulsion at his recommendation that former Governor George Ryan have his sentnce communted, was quick to call on the General Assembly to act quickly to set a special election to replace Barack Obama.  He noted that anyone appointed under the current circumstances would enter the Senate “under a cloud.”

 

The governor’s arch foe House Speaker Michael Madigan and erstwhile ally outgoing Senate Majority Leader Emil Jones both said that they were ready to call the legislature back into session as early as Monday to act.  Madigan is likely to initiate impeachment proceedings, but that could take weeks to play out.  McHenry County’s  own Representative Jack Franks, the governor’s harshest critic, was all over the airways saying he would initiate impeachment proceedings himself.  He is one of the few Democrats whose stature and political future could be boosted by this scandal.

 

Jones, at first thought to be a possible suspect as Senate Candidate 5 in the charges against the Governor, is not one of those who will be so lucky.  His long cozy relationship with Blagojevich will permanently tarnish his image and his chances of a cushy path way to an honored retirement via a place-holding Senate appointment have vanished.

 

But rising political star Rep. Jesse Jackson, Jr. is more damaged.  He was identified in press reports this morning as Senate Candidate 5.  Jackson, of course, denies making or receiving any corrupt bargains.  He reportedly volunteered to meet with investigators.  But he did have an embarrassing lengthy personal interview with the Governor just the day before the shit hit the fan.  Ooops!

 

The verdict is out on possible damage to the President Elect himself.  On one hand U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald himself pointed out in his press conference, there is no indication that Obama knew anything about the scheme.  Some Chicago media sources are reporting that Rahm Emanuel, Obama’s designated Chief of Staff may have been the person to alert the U.S. Attorney’s office after receiving feelers from the Governor’s office.  Blagojevich’s own foul-mouthed contempt of the Obama for not offering anything in exchange for the seat is also exculpatory.  The New York Times has even attributed Blagojevich’s downfall to Obama’s intersession earlier this year to break a legislative log-jam blocking the campaign-finance reform law that set the Governor up on his feeding frenzy. And Obama has joined the chorus of voices calling for the Governor’s resignation and a special election to fill his seat.

 

On the other hand, salivating wing-nuts are falling all over themselves trying to chain Obama to the anvil of Illinois political corruption.  Just being from the state and being a practicing politician are enough to taint any one in a lot of people’s eyes.  They have long tried to tarnish him with his relationship to Blagojevich bag-man Tony Rezko.  Now, inevitably, the names of some of his acquaintances, political allies, and friends are bound to pop up, however tangentially, in the on-going investigation.  Republican pundits and talking head wind-bags will be waiting with their hammers to play whack-a-mole at the first sight of a whisker.  It will get ugly.  It may take some of romance from the mainstream media’s honeymoon with the new administration as they absorb the new Obama-as-tainted-Illinois-Pol meme.

 

Rod Blagojevich raided the hen house one time to many.  The splatter of feathers, blood, feces and egg yolk will take a long time to clean up.

 

Read Lurid Details Here )

 

 


GUEST BLOGGER CAROLYN QUINN--My Joe Biden
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin



 

Our favorite guest blogger Carolyn covered Barack Obama’s Springfield announcement in February 2007,  Now she has sent along her very personal message to Senator Joe Biden welcoming him to the Democratic ticket.  You can send a message of your own.  Just go to http://my.barackobama.com/welcomejoe

 

Dear Senator Biden—

 

I saw Senator Biden for the first time in Chicago, July 15th of '07.  I only saw him because I wanted to hear Barack Obama speak again.  But it was Joe Biden that day who was fabulous on the stage.  It was Joe Biden who afterward shook my hand and asked me my name.  It was Joe Biden who sat down next to me and shared his amusement in the moment.  He introduced his two sons to me, and his wife Jill. He signed my hat and dated it, which is why I know the day I first saw Senator Biden in person.  He is one dynamic and personable human being. On top of that, some months later, he had the best (by far) tailgate party at Soldiers' Field at the AFL-CIO debates.  But all that stuff is just the frosting.

 

Like Senator Obama, Joe Biden is an expert on Constitutional Law.  At this time in history, our Constitution needs a champion like never before.

 

Ever.

 

The president and the vice president swear above all, and before the world, to Defend and Protect the Constitution of the United States of America.  The talk I hear surrounding a laundry list of why Bush/Cheney should be impeached, is talk concerned with the rule of law.  But it does not address the item which seems to me to be the truest – and also the best reason to show Senator McCain the exit sign before he ever enters the White House.  President Bush did not defend our constitution: he consistently skirted our constitution, defied our constitution and demeaned our constitution.  Breach of contract, pure and simple.  And Senator McCain promises to do the same.

 

We cannot allow it.

 

Today we have Senators Obama AND Biden standing together on the steps of the Old State Capitol in my home state, which of course calls Abe Lincoln to mind.  President Lincoln defended the Union when it was under fire from within, and it was a tremendous personal struggle.  President Obama must defend our Constitution which is now under fire from within.  While we are not looking at civil war over it, we are looking at some severe civil strife.  This, too, will be a tremendous struggle. Senator Joe Biden is the best possible person to be his partner-champion in this struggle.

 

They say Barack Obama brings us hope, a phenomenon.  I see it differently.  He brings us inspiration to act, to volunteer, to participate.

 

The volunteer armies of regular Americans who are doing all that footwork are the phenomenon that brings us hope. Barack gave us the inspiration and encouragement to live hope, enact hope, be hope.

 

My welcome message to Senator Joe Biden: I could not be more thrilled, knowing you are on our ticket, and it IS "our" ticket.  You are part of the inspiration.  And you are part of the work to enact hope.  You are a most welcome member of the team.

 

You are a champion.

 

Carolyn Quinn

 

 


SIGN UP FOR AN OBAMA ACCEPTANCE SPEECH WATCH PARTY
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin
 


Returning to the Old State Capital in Springfield where he announced his historic race for the Presidency on a bitterly cold day 19 months ago, Barack Obama electrified the nation on Saturday by introducing Delaware Senator Joe Biden as his running mate. Wasting no time the Democratic tag team went to work on John McCain, his many houses, and his determination to slavishly follow the disastrous policies of George Bush.

Now it is on to Denver, where Democrats will meet to nominate the Obama-Biden ticket. All week long a star studded cast will address the convention making the case for change and hope to the American People. The disparate elements of the Party will come together. Wound will be healed.

The highlight will come on Thursday night when Barack Obama will accept his party’s nomination not just in front of the delegates to the convention but to an audience of 70,000 Americans at a football stadium and uncounted millions on television around the world.

Now you can join in the celebration by signing on to attend one of three McHenry County Watch Parties.

Just log on to  and sign up. Details below.http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/organizeforchange


THREE GREAT WATCH PARTIES TO CHOOSE FROM!

Now you can join in the celebration by signing on to attend one of three Watch Parties with other excited McHenry County Democrats and friends. Just click on the link below and sign up!
 



 

http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/organizeforchange/

McHenry County Convention Watch Party

Host: Meg Murray-Bradshaw
Time: Thursday, August 28, 7:30 PM
Where: Crystal Lake Party Bar
In the Holiday Inn Crystal Lake
800 S. Rt. 31 (Rt. 31 & Three Oaks Rd, one block south of Rt. 14)
Crystal Lake, IL

Come celebrate Senator Obama's acceptance speech with other Obama supporters! The party officially starts at 7:30pm. However, doors open at 6pm, and some of us die-hards will arrive early to watch the convention on the big screen TV. Join us early if you like. Senator Obama speaks at 9:00pm. There is no cover charge. There is a cash bar. You can walk down the hall to order food from the hotel, and the hotel staff will bring it to you in the bar. Please sign up. We will let the bar know our estimated numbers so they can arrange for enough staff to be on hand. Come witness change in the making with fellow Obama supporters. Yes We Can!

Convention Watch Party - Melissa Bean for Congress/NW Suburbs for Obama

Host: Raymond Suelzer
Time: Thursday, August 28, 7:30 PM
Where: Dock’s Bar and Grill
113 E. Liberty St. (Rt, 176)
Wauconda, IL

We will have appetizers, a cash bar, and plenty of Democrats, Independents, and fair minded Republicans!

Cary House Party to Watch Acceptance Speech

Host: Becky Deignan
Time: Thursday, August 28, 7:30 PM
Where: 10 Boxwood Lane
Cary, IL

Sign up for "Cary House Party to watch acceptance speech.


THE TEAM IS PICKED! GAME ON!
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin

Barack Obama was able to manage the suspense almost until the last moment.  The campaign’s famous self-discipline and tight control of message unraveled only a little as a relentless mainstream media, sniffing the wind for any clue, began to besiege the home of Joe Biden the senior senator from Delaware.  Helicopters circled the scene as if it were an L.A. freeway chase.  When the Secret Service showed up it was game over.  The word was out just hours before the candidate was prepared to make an official announcement.

All evening  Kathy Brady-Murfin kept checking her cell phone.  “I’m expecting a text from Barack!” The message did not come through before she had to turn in.  I’m sure the first thing she did this morning before heading off to work was checking that phone.

Kathy usually does not share my passionate involvement in politics.  In her jaundiced eye all politicians are suspect.  And she usually maintains that there’s not much difference between Democrats and Republicans.  When push comes to shove, she usually does vote Democratic, however.  Rumor has it she may have even voted for me upon occasion.  But Kathy is genuinely excited about Obama.  How excited?  She even signed up for a modest monthly automatic contribution to the campaign through the election, overcoming her usual anxiety over our precarious finances.

My wife is symbolic of all of the folks breathlessly awaiting word from Obama.  It is the passionate devotion of people like her the will give the Democratic ticket an edge that no horse race poll can take into account. 

Are those folks happy with the choice? Judging from the comments flooding into pro-Democratic sites like Huffington Post and the Daily Kos, a handful of curmudgeons and inevitable trolls aside, the pick is a grand slam home run.

The new team got its debut today in Springfield.  Returning to the picturesque and symbolic steps of the Old State Capital on a warm, sunny afternoon, Obama immediately invoked the memory of an equally sunny but much colder March afternoon 19 months ago where he launched his campaign of hope and change to an ecstatic, if frozen audience.  In rolled up shirtsleeves this time, Obama introduced his choice for running mate with genuine enthusiasm and affection.  He emphasized not only Biden’s extensive and widely admired foreign policy chops, but his working class Irish Catholic background, his struggles over tragedy, and his legendary devotion to the family to which he returned each night from Washington on an Amtrack train.  He made much of Biden sharing in an “improbable story,” but one which is intensely American.

Obama also contrasted Biden’s handling to the recent Russian invasion of Georgia to McCain’s bellicose attempt at policy making by press conference by pointing out that Biden “quietly” went to Georgia to meet that nation’s embattled president.  He pointedly said that Biden was “what many others pretend to be -- a statesman with sound judgment who doesn't have to hide behind bluster to keep America strong.’

Biden for his part sprinted confidently to the stage looking—silver hair plugs not withstanding--almost as youthful as Obama.  His speech made it clear why he will be not only an outstanding addition to the ticket, but a great vice president as well.  It is expected that a veep pick will laud the man who picked him.  But Biden was able to articulate how he had personally come to admire Obama as a leader, an agent of change, and as a statesman.  He immediately diffused the pitiful attempts of John McCain’s campaign to use his own presidential debate remarks to undercut Obama.

More importantly, in his characteristic blunt, plain spoken language, Biden immediately went to work on destroying the McCain campaign without personal rancor against a man he called his long time friend.  He invoked the kitchen table discussions “after the kids have gone to bed” repeated in millions of American families beset by soaring prices, stagnating or falling wages, and plummeting home values about how to make ends meet.  He included himself and his family—he is the least wealthy member of the U.S. Senate and reportedly had to take second mortgages on his home to finance his children’s college education—in those kitchen tables discussions.  He contrasted this to McCain who will "have to figure out which of the seven tables to sit at.” 

Then it was off to the races.  Biden lashed McCain to George W. Bush’s sinking and disastrous presidency with a ruthless precision that Obama has been loath to pursue.  He was not even shy about taking on McCain’s status as a war hero who increasingly invokes his P.O.W. experience every time he faces criticism-- "these times require more than a good soldier, they require a wise leader."  He could point out that his own son, the sitting Delaware Attorney General, will soon be deployed to Iraq as a member of the National Guard linking himself to the sacrifice of military families everywhere.  What a contrast to the neo-con war hawks, McCain aside, who avoided war service for themselves and their privileged children.

All in all it was a stellar performance all around.  The photo op with two tall, handsome men flanked by attractive wives, although noticeably shorter in duration than the turn taken by Barack and Michelle last February—probably at the insistence of a nervous Secret Service—made for a compelling pictures.

I didn’t check in with Fox News, where I expect that the usual sniping echoed the pitiful talking points from the McCain campaign, but commentators on both CNN and MSNBC effusive in their praise of Obama’s choice and the performance of both members of the ticket in Springfield.  The only misgivings I heard were that Biden, the fifth senior U.S. Senator, would not reinforce Obama’s message of change and that he does not bring strong economic policy credentials on the table in a year when the sagging economy is emerging as the big issue.

I have to disagree with both assessments.  Biden, although a senior senator, was always something of an outsider just by virtue of his daily commutes back to Delaware and his intense devotion to his family.  Secondly, Obama can argue that the personal esteem in which Biden is held by both sides of the aisle will make him the perfect choice to help steer a program of change through congress.

On the economy, Biden is a great choice because, as Barack repeated in his introduction, “he gets it.”  He understands what working and middle class Americans are going through.  He has been there himself.  And he has a legislative history of not only fighting for, but often spearheading economic initiatives critical to those kitchen table voters.  And he is the antidote to the class cluelessness of the likely ticket of McCain-Romney.

Now it’s on to Denver and sharpening the message of the Obama-Biden campaign even more.

 


TIMELINE--New MoveOn Ad
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin

 

MoveOn.Org has unveiled this new TV spot contrasting the desire of the American—and Iraqi people—for a clear timeline to withdraw U.S. Forces with John McCain’s open ended commitment. 

 

Left unsaid is the bright contrast between McCain’s stubborn commitment to the quagmire and Barack Obama steady and unwavering support of a carefully planned withdrawal which he reasserted  Monday in a celebrated New York Times op-ed piece.

 

Under Federal rules MoveOn can only ask viewers to raise the issue with McCain.  But an independent blog like this—your reliable, if quirky, source of information—can certainly report the news about the new ad and specifically tell you that Barack Obama has a different position.

 

Oops!  I already have.


CAL THOMAS ON OBAMA'S CHRISTIANTIY--He's-Gasp!-a universalist!
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin



 

As usual I am a couple of days behind with the newspaper, so forgive me for the delayed rant. Today over lunch at work, I finally read Tuesday’s NORTHWEST HERALD and the Cal Thomas’s column therein.

The conservative columnist is one of the principle journalistic voices of the Religious Right and a frequent Fox blowhard.  He has found a new way to attack Barack Obama for his religion.  No, not for being a secret Muslim—he’ll leave that to e-mail viral rumor mongers.  It’s not even a revisit of the Jeremiah Wright dust up.  It’s for having the audacity to poach on the right wing’s private preserve—Evangelical and conservative Catholic voters--while  “calling himself” a Christian.

He will not take Obama’s word for his Christianity.  Instead he cites a four year old interview given to respected Chicago Sun-Times religion editor Cathleen Falsani for her popular book The God Factor: Inside the Spiritual Lives of Public People.  By the way Falsani should in no way be blamed or how Thomas mangles and misuses her work.

“I’m rooted in the Christian tradition,” said Obama. He then adds something most Christians will see as universalism: “I believe there are many paths to the same place, and that is a belief that there is a higher power, a belief that we are connected as a people.”

Thomas manages to put out an audible sneer in the written word “universalism.”  Obviously, anyone who espouses universalist views cannot be a Christian, according to Thomas who denies the “central tenets of the Christian faith, including the deity and uniqueness of Christ as the sole mediator between God and Man and be a Christian. Such people do have a label applied to them in Scripture. They are called ‘false prophets.’”

He also lambasts Obama because, in Falsani’s words, he “doesn’t believe he, or anyone else, will go to hell. But he’s not sure he’ll be going to heaven, either.”  Indeed she quotes Obama thus:

“I don’t presume to have knowledge of what happens after I die. When I tuck in my daughters at night and I feel like I’ve been a good father to them, and I see that I am transferring values that I got from my mother and that they’re kind people and that they’re honest people, and they’re curious people, that’s a little piece of heaven.”

Well, I guess Thomas has got Obama dead to rights.  That does sound suspiciously universalist.  Of course the bigotry comes in the assertion that any one espousing universalist theology cannot claim to be Christian.

It will come as a BIG surprise to millions of people who have never heard the word universalism that they are not Christians after all.  This kind of “virtual” universalism is common among members of many the churches once called “mainstream protestant.”  It is also widely held by many Catholics, including many leading theologians.  One does not have to be a member of the of that strange sect Unitiarian Universalsits to thus believe.

This is not the first time Thomas has gone after a Democratic presidential candidate on these grounds.  In 2004 he went after another erstwhile member of a United Church of Christ congregation, Governor Howard Dean.  Then Thomas attacked Dean’s Congregationalism because “It does not believe in ministerial authority of church hierarchy.  Each Congregationalist believes he is indirect contact with God and entitled to sort out truth for themselves.” 

Worse yet Thomas argued that such beliefs should disqualify those who hold them from public office.

In a letter to the Editor of the NORTHWEST HERALD at the time I wrote:

“Many American denominations share the same tradition of congregational polity including the Unitarian Universalists and the Baptists.  Many other believe in the direct experience of God without hierarchical or priestly intervention. These include the Quakers and groups in the Anabaptist tradition including the Brethren and Mennonites.  According to Thomas this should debar adherents from public office…

“…Thomas insists that candidates pass religious litmus tests.  Those who fail to do so are not only wrong or mistaken, but are also evil and defiant of God.  He thus joins Pat Robertson who maintains that Democracy is only legitimate when all officeholders swear by his brand of Christianity,  Otherwise he is perfectly content with a dictatorship of the righteous…

“Neither Thomas nor Robertson understands the central tenant of liberal democracy—freedom of expression and practice of religion and a separation of government from any sect.  Indeed they would transform the “culture wars” for which they have long been cheerleaders, into actual civil war.  In their own way they are indistinguishable  from the bearded Taliban clerics they have pretend to despise. In reality, it seems, they are just jealous of their power.”                                                             

 


A GIFT TOO GOOD TO BE TRUE?
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin



 

Could it be?  The pontificators think it’s just a bargaining ploy.  The neo-imperialists of the present maladministration are breaking out in hives and flop sweat.  Barack Obama must be smiling. The Iraqi government is threatening to show American and other international forces the door when the United Nations mandate expires at the end of the year.  That would cut the Gordian Knot and allow the new President a quick, clean Exit from the quagmire.

Here is what Leila Fadel and Mike Tharp reported for McClatchy Newspapers:

BAGHDAD — Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki raised the possibility that his country won't sign a status of forces agreement with the United States and will ask U.S. troops to go home when their U.N. mandate to be in Iraq expires at the end of the year.

Maliki made the comment after weeks of complaints from Shiite Muslim lawmakers that U.S. proposals that would govern a continued troop presence in Iraq would infringe on Iraq's sovereignty…

 


DEMOCRATS AT HARVARD--The One With the Cow
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin


 

The Democratic Party of McHenry County assembled by Harvard High School before the Milk Days Parade. (Photo by Tom Cynor)

Hillary Clinton was giving her long awaited concession and endorsement of Barack Obama as McHenry County Democrats gathered for the Harvard Milk Days Parade Saturday morning.  It was hot and muggy.  The sun burned through thin clouds as we assembled and waited behind the high school. We were near the end of the parade so we had plenty of time to soak up the sun—burn.  We finally started moving after 2 pm, a full hour after the head of the parade started off.

About thirty adults plus assorted children turned out.  Our unit included a float, a Tom Cynor for State’s Attorney trailer and several candidates. Most of us were elegantly turned out in our bright blue “Proud to be a McHenry County Democrat” tee shirts.

For those who are unfamiliar with the place, Harvard lies in the northwest of McHenry County just a bit south of the Wisconsin border.  It once was the center of the dairy industry and the town was known as the “Milk Capital of the World.”  That status is celebrated by Milk Days, Illinois oldest continuous municipal festival dating to 1941, and by the beloved fiberglass statue of Harmilda the cow located at the intersection of U.S. Route 14, Illinois Route 173, and the city’s main drag, Ayers Street (AKA “The Milky Way.”

Although the Dean Foods dairy plant is still a major local employer, most of the dairy farms are gone now and the city long ago lost its dairy crown.

But Harvard is the most resolutely working class of all McHenry County municipalities.  Far from encroaching suburbia that has swallowed most of the southeast portion of the county and is now marching north from Huntley in the southwest housing prices are relatively modest.  Local industry has provided jobs.  A brief brush with prosperity evaporated when Motorola  shut down a mammoth new cell phone production factory a few years ago.  5000 jobs disappeared with the stroke of a pen.  And the building sits empty on the edge of town on the edge of town defying all attempts to attract new tenants and new jobs.

Nearly 40% of the population is now Hispanic.  There is a lot of tension between the new immigrants and the older Anglo community.  But Ayer Street and the rest of downtown would now be a virtual ghost town if it were not for the many Latino business that have opened there in recent years.  In fact the parade crowd along the Milky Way was largely Hispanic, while Anglos tended to gather on the tree shaded lawns along the residential streets between the High School and downtown.

Democrats, however, go a warm welcome from both communities.  Not a block was passed without out breaks of actual cheering, whooping and fist pumping.  A lot of folks called out for Obama.  While we have always had support in Harvard, not too many years ago scattered individuals sheepishly acknowledged us hoping that their Republican neighbors would not notice.  Boos would sometimes outnumber cheers.  This year there was one boo.

Coroner Candidate David Bachmann watched the parade from the sidelines with his family.  He wrote in an e-mail to other party members, “I am soooooooooo proud of our people that were in Harvard today…The Republicans should be embarrassed.  All they had was an old beat up car, not resorted at all, with a few campaign signs made of old cardboard stuck to the car with “duck tape”…Not a single candidate or party representation…”

Any way here are some photos from the day.

                                                                    

State’s Attorney Candidate Tom Cynor with his main man, Quinn. (This and all further photos by Murfin)

                                                                        

Auditor Candidate Kerry Julian and family.

                                       


The candidate contingent—Robert Ludwig, County Board Dist. 6; James McTague, County Board Dist. 1; Cynor; Robert Abboud, 16th Congressional District; Julian; and Jeff Thirtyacer, County Board Dist. 4.

                                       


 Thirtyacer and Bill Nowaskey prepare to step off at the head of the contingent.

 


REACHING ACROSS THE ABYSS--Uniting Obamaniacs and Clintonistas
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin
 



Regular readers of this blog (if any) may have wondered at the absence of regular commentary on the Democratic Presidential Race of late.  As a matter of fact I have not posted a detailed article on the contest since “The Tonya Harding Option—Will Clinton Take it?” way back on March 26th and touched on it tangentially in only three or four other posts.

 

This is not because the campaign has not been heated—it has raged at blast furnace intensity—or because it is uninteresting—it has had all of the high drama, intricate plot twists, a cast of vivid characters of the most sizzling blockbuster.  Nor has it been because my candidate, Barack Obama has taken some lumps and ridden out some rough patches as the Hillary Clinton, channeling the Bozo Bop Bag has kept on popping back up.  I stand by Obama and I have a grudging admiration for Clinton’s amazing resilience.

 

While I have not posted here, I have added comments here and there across the blog-o-sphere.  What those comments have consistently said is basically this:  “Look, like it or not Barack Obama is the likely nominee of the party.  Great form me.  Painful for Clinton’s staunch and adoring supporters.  But no matter what happens—even if deus ex machina Hillary is magically delivered the nomination—the stakes are far too high for the people of this nation and the peace and security of the world for Democrats to fail to rally enthusiasitycally around our candidate.  I personally pledge to do so if Hillary becomes the nominee.  Nothing is more worisome to me than polling data that indicates that very significant numbers of each candidates supporters will vote for John McCain or sit on their hands in Novemeber if their favorite looses the nomination.  We must recognize that beyond personal bitterness, far more unites us a Democrats and Americans than divides us.  Pick your favorite hobby horse issues—the war, the ecconomy, the envirornment, women’s rights, civil liberties, health care, education—and either Democrat outshines the tarnished and disgraced re-tread of the Bush maladministration offered by the Republicans.”

 

One of the big reasons I have not posted here is to keep from falling into the temptation of joining the tit-for-tat bashing, name calling, and whining that has for the last several weeks been the hallmark of the struggle, at least as it is played out with passion in pundit columns, cable trash talk, and endless blogs.  I choose not to help bitterness fester.  As for me, I may take issue with Clinton and her campaign about how and what they have done since realizing that the pre-ordained nomination was slipping from their her hands.  But I love and admire those who love her.  I would hope in the reverse circumstances they would love and admire me.  We need each other.  Honestly.  We have to go beyond mouthing vague platitudes to each other all the while muttering under our breaths.  We must not now make empty gestures of reconciliation based on convenience, but must reconcile out of principle and respect.

 


TAR AND FEATHERING ABC FOR "DISPICABLE" DEBATE
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin



I was dutifully playing secretary at the McHenry County Democratic Patry’s monthly meeting last night when ABC hosts Charles Gibson and George Stephanopoulos played their game of pin-the-slur-on-the-donkey at the Presidential Debate.  I hopped on the Internet when I got home and gave it a spin and found sputtering outrage and slack-jawed disbelief in about equal measure.  It seems like the boys couldn’t get to a substantive policy question for more than 50 minutes, instead pasting both candidates—but Barack Obama in particular—with  a parade of tempest in a tea pot questions.  Flag lapel pins?  Can your opponent win?  In a particularly pathetic moment Stephanopoulos floated a question about the association of Obama and former Weather Underground fugitive Billy Ayers—the two sat on a charity board for a couple of years together over a decade or so ago.  The question was more outrageous in that it was literally spoon fed to the former Clinton political operative by Sean Hannity, one of the most over the top Fox “News” ranters.   

 

Perhaps it was predictable to find ABC excoriated on the Huffington Post and the Daily Koz.  Certainly it was no surprise to watch Keith Obermann’s reaction at MSNBS in the immediate aftermath of the train wreck.  But it was a mild surprise this morning to hear equally scornful commentary from just about every one in sight, except of the New York Times’ David Brooks, who fawned over the ABC performance.  Just about everyone else was scathing.  In perhaps the most widely circulated critique the Washington Post’s Tom Shales wrote that Gibson and Stephonopulous “turned in shoddy, despicable performances.”  Editor & Publisher it "perhaps the most embarrassing performance by the media in a major presidential debate in years."

 

ABC’s own web site was deluged by protests, and not just by Obama partisans, lefties, and Democrats.  When I last checked 17,829 comments were posted.  Of course I could read even a fraction of them, but I read dozens.  I was hard pressed to find even one supportive comment.

 

The network was force to acknowledge the uproar on its evening news broadcast anchored by Gibson.  They ran a piece called “The Debate about the Debate” and even ran scrolls of some of the outraged comments.  At the end Gibson blandly said that ABC appreciates the comments.  He neither defended nor apologized for the conduct of the debate.  Stephanopoulos, a staple of the broadcast’s political coverage was conspicuously absent, although he defended his performance elsewhere.

 

MoveOn.Org is circulating a petition to ABC and other networks demanding a higher standard of ethics and journalism.  I was proud to sign it.  I hope you do too.


 

THOMAS JEFFERSON DINNER--A Night Out With The Democrats
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin

 

At the third annual Thomas Jefferson Dinner of the Democratic Party of McHenry County, more than two hundred folks, almost half of them from organized labor, crowded the ball room of the Prairie Lodge at Sun City in Huntley on Saturday Night.

 

The room was buzzing with excitement.  And I must admit that I was a little excited myself.  I was on tap to receive the Robert McGarry Award for Community Service.  The Murfin contingent filled up two tables right up front.  Not only was my wife, Kathy Brady-Murfin, in attendance, but my daughters Heather Pearson and Maureen Buchanan were on hand with their families.  So were Evan Buchanan’s parents Laurie and Len, “Grandma” Pat Sorensen, and Libby Pappalardo of the McHenry County Peace Group and her husband Brian.  My former sister in law and dear friend Arlene Brennen was there with her husband Michael. A whole contingent of Wobblies came up from Chicago including Fellow Workers Judy Freeeman, Mike Hargis, Kathy Taylor, and Hannah Frish.  These folks surprised me with another gift I will treasure, an IWW belt buckle.

Here are some photos from the evening.

 


Illinois Secretary of State Jesse White kicked off the evening with remarks.  He made a special effort for all the candidates present to get photos with him to use in their publicity.  His advice to them:  “Use my name any way you like to help you and ask for permission later.”  White had to rush off to another event, but took time for everyone who wanted to shake his hand.

                                                 

McHenry County Democratic Party Chair Kathy Bergan Schmidt, was mistress of ceremonies.
                                

Congresswoman Melissa Bean was on hand telling the audience how frightened suburban Republicans in Congress are as they watch once reliable districts slip into the Democratic column. Bean has also been on the road for Barack Obama’s  Presidential Campaign.

                                                   

Sean McGarry, son of the late, beloved Party Chair Bob McGarry reminisced about his father and paid tribute to his mother Lois as he introduced the presentation of the Robert McGarry Award for Community Service.

                                

It was an overwhelming honor to receive the award.  I managed to get through my acceptance speech.  The prepared remarks, which were more or less what I actually said, are posted at the end of this entry.

                                                                                                                     
                                                    
                                                  

Illinois Treasurer Alexi Giannoulias is a popular figure in McHenry County.  Last summer he made a point of marching with the Party in several local parades.  Giannoulias is also a high profile supporter of his good friend Senator Obama.

                                                   

 

Paula Yensen, Lake-in-the-Hills Turstee, candidate for District 2 McHenry County Board, and major domo of the Jefferson Dinner introduced the Thomas Jefferson Award for Lifetime Achievement.  Latter in the evening former Party Chair Patrick Quimet surprised her with a dozen roses in recognition her work on the dinner and the audience rose in a standing ovation.

                                                

Former Illinois AFL-CIO President Margaret Blackshere rose to accept the Thomas Jefferson Award.  Her rise from kindergarten teacher to leadership of the state labor  body is legendary.  She recounted ticking items off of her personal “Bucket List” since retiring last year.  She told inspiring stories of defying gun toting guards in Indonesia by singing Solidarity Forever  to young women workers barred from receiving her visit to their company housing  and aiding an injured girl in Cambodia.  But her biggest “bucket list” item this year is “Getting Barack Obama elected President.!”                   

 

 

The following is, more or less, what I said in my acceptance remarks.

 

This is an honor in so many ways.  I am so glad to be part of this celebration honoring a personal hero, Thomas Jefferson whose ringing words have been a major inspiration to me and whose flawed personal life reminds me of how difficult it can be to live up to our loftiest aims.

 

It is great to be here on a night that is so much a celebration of labor movement and our mutual dedication to the rights and welfare of working people.  I am humbled to be honored the same evening as Margaret Blackshere.  By the way, Margaret, we both are former Union officers.  You led the thousands of members of the ALF-CIO in Illinois.  At the age of 23 I was General Secretary Treasurer of the Industrial Workers of the World and literally sat in Big Bill Heywood’s old chair, the nominal leader of maybe 2000 member world wide.  Some of my oldest friends from my Wobbly days are in attendance.  It may be safe for them to share a few stories.  I believe the statue of limitations has run out.

 

It is humbling to receive an award in the name of Bob McGarry.  Not only was he a good friend—he was a friend to every one he met—but he was a personal mentor who dared bring me on as his vice chair at a time some in the Party fretted that I was a wild eyed radical.

 

I am also happy to see folks I have worked with over the years as I have tried to be of service to the causes of peace, justice, and equality in McHenry County.  Any thing that I might have accomplished has only been made possible by the hard work and sacrifice of so many as we worked together at the Congregational Unitarian Church, with the Interfaith Council for Social Justice and Diversity Day, and in the McHenry County Peace Group.

 

Of course my family has been patient with me.  They were often cheated from my full attention.  They got used to me being gone for meetings or finding me at the computer at 3 AM.  Special thanks to my wife, Kathy Brady Murfin; my daughters Heather Pearson and Maureen Buchanan who are here tonight with their families.

 

I was a stranger in McHenry County, lonesome and at a loss as to how to renew the activism that had been the center of my adult life when I responded to a little want ad placed by then Democratic Party Chair Richard Short for precinct committeemen.  Since then I have served under chairs Monty Yeats, Frank McClatchy, Bob McGarry, John Bartmann, Pat Ouimett, Tom Cynor, and Kathy Bergan Schmidt.  I even spent a couple of months in the chair myself.  That’s better than 18 years.  I realize I am receiving this award mostly for having hung around so long.

 

But I appreciate it more than I can say.

 

 


A RESPONSIBLE PLAN TO END THE WAR IN IRAQ--Lend Your Support
formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin

 Forty-two Democratic Candidates for Congress have joined in endorsing A Responsible Plan to End the War in Iraq.  The plan calls for an immediate end of military operation in Iraq and a withdrawal of troops from that country.  Although it does not set a time limit on the withdrawal process, it does not allow for “residual” troops to be left behind to train Iraqi forces, to act as security or police, or to selectively attack “terrorist” targets.  The plan also includes other critical steps necessary to support the end of military operations and to repair the damage done by an unnecessary war.  According to the group: 

Our plan will:
  1. End U.S. Military Action in Iraq
  2. Use U.S. diplomatic power
  3. Address humanitarian concerns
  4. Restore our Constitution
  5. Restore our military
  6. Restore independence to the media
  7. Create a new, U.S.-centered energy policy

Read how...

 

Some regular readers of this blog might wonder why I endorse a plan different from the one put forth by the Presidential Candidate I support,  Barack Obama.  I admire Obama for his early and consistent opposition to the war.  I believe that if elected he will take steps to end the conflict.  But his announced plan—a draw down over a year and a half while remaining forces continue to have a limited combat roll—mostly force protection and action against “proven” terrorist target is not optimal.  It reflects genuine concern by the military of the dangers of a “retreat under fire,” but it probably also reflects a  calculation that this kind of measured withdrawal is the most that is politically.

 

Actions like this one by Democratic candidates and other respected leaders help change the political landscape.  The broader the evident political support is for a rapid disengagement, the more likely that a President Obama—or even a President Clinton—and a Democratic Congress with secure majorities will feel emboldened to go farther faster.

 

I urge you to give careful consideration to lending your name to this effort.

 

 


Home