Home

Today’s Almanac—July 30, 2010

  • Jul. 31st, 2010 at 6:53 AM
formal portrait

On July 30 and August 1, 1774 Joseph Priestley, a Dissenting clergyman, philosopher, and chemist conducted experiments that isolated what would later be called Oxygen in a laboratory built for him by his friend William Petty-FitzMaurice, Earl of Shelburne at his country estate Bowood House.  Priestly had been conducting experiments on air for some time.  Priestly focused the Sun’s rays on a glass vial containing mercuric oxide. The resulting heat released a new gas.  Priestley observed that when a candle flame was exposed to the substance it grew brighter and that mice breathing it became more lively and alert.  He reported that breathing it himself was not different than breathing ordinary air, but his heart and respiration seemed “lighter.”  Although Priestley had isolated it, he did not fully understand what he had found.  He continued to adhere to a version of the Phlogiston Theory that held that combustible materials were made of two parts—phlogiston given off when the substance was burned, and the dephlogisticated part was thought to be its true form.  Priestley call his discovery dephlogisticated air.  Before he could write up his experiments, he departed for a planned European tour in company with the Earl.  In Paris Priestley met with the most famous scientist of the day, Antoine Lavoisier and duplicated his experiment for him and several colleagues.  Lavoisier would later claim to have independently discovered oxygen earlier, but there is no evidence of it.  And Lavoisier also probably received a letter from Swedish pharmacist Carl Wilhelm Scheele who had isolated the substance, which he called Fire Air, even earlier, in 1772 by burning nitric oxides and other compounds, which the Swede sent him on September 30, 1774.  What Lavosier did do was to discount the Phlogiston theory and prove that the new gas was a basic element.  This understanding is credited with being the foundation of modern chemistry.  Meanwhile, Priestley had returned to Bowood and written up his notes which he sent in letters to members of the Royal Academy in March of the following year and his paper An Account of further Discoveries in Air was published in the Society’s journal, Philosophical Transactions.  The tardy Scheele did not get his work published until A Chemical Treatise on Air and Fire, was released in 1777.  By that time Lavoisier had also issued his research in his paper Sur la combustion en général published in 1777 and given the name Oxygen to the elemental gas.  Priestly continued his experiments, including one that proved that Oxygen was necessary to respiration.  He combined years of experiments on air, with historical perspectives and philosophical speculation in his great 6 volume opus Experiments and Observations on Different Kinds of Air published between 1772 and 1786.  Volume 2, published in 1775 contained the notes on his discovery.  Priestley was born in 1733 to a Dissenting family in Yorkshire.  Intending to become a minister, a nearly fatal illness caused him to doubt that he had experienced the expected personal conversion experience needed for salvation.  Dissatisfied with Calvinist doctrine, he began to develop his own alternative theology.  Meanwhile a private tutor introduced him to higher mathematics and science.  Over time Priestley became convinced that God would not operate outside the laws of science and would manifest himself in observable nature.  This led to a rejection of miracles including, eventually, the virgin birth, physical resurrection from the dead, and the divinity of Christ.  After studying at a Dissenter academy at Dantry, Priestly entered the active ministry as a Rational Dissenter.  After a shaky start Priestly became an established minister supplementing his meager income as a school master and giving lectures on science on the side.  His first book was the revolutionary The Rudiments of English Grammar in 1761. During a six year stay in Warrington as a tutor of philosophy at a Dissenting academy he met and married Mary Wilkinson and began a family.  During this period he authored admired histories of Christianity and of science.  He also expounded on educational theory in his book Essay on a Course of Liberal Education for Civil and Active Life published in 1765.  It is regarded as the most important work on English educational philosophy between John Locke and Edmund Spencer.  His later Lectures on History and General Policy became the basis for courses of study on both sides of the Atlantic.  In 1764 he undertook a massive history of electricity for which he consulted all of the active experimenters in the field, including the American Benjamin Franklin then in England as an agent for the Colonies.  Franklin was impressed by the clergyman/educator and encouraged him to include his own experiments as well as reproducing those of others, in his work on electricity.  Along with other prominent scientists, Franklin sponsored Priestley for membership in the Royal Academy.  Their relationship would also serve Priestly well in later years.  The 700 page The History and Present State of Electricity was published in 1767 and an edition for popular readers called Familiar Introduction to the Study of Electricity was issued the next year.  Priestly was becoming a famous man, but decided in 1767 to return to the active ministry in Leeds where the congregation was not happy with his growing heresy.  He became friends and collaborator with a radical Anglican cleric, Theophilus Lindsey whose views both mirrored and influenced his own.  Despite isolation from his own congregation and particularly in light of stepped up attacks from those dissenters who took up Methodism, Priestley decided to expound on his religious views in a major new work, the three volume Institutes of Natural and Revealed Religion, which laid out the basis of what would become English Unitarianism published 1772-’77.  The fourth part of the Institutes, An History of the Corruptions of Christianity, became so long that he was issued it separately in 1782.  Meanwhile Priestley happily engaged in pamphlet disputations with both orthodox Anglicans, and Methodists and other evangelical dissenters.  He also began to turn his attention to politics, in which he took a decided Whig position.  He entered the fray in defense of radical Dissenters from increasing government suppression.  Essay on the First Principles of Government, a vital early work of modern liberal political theory was published in 1767.  He was soon disputing on less an authority than William Blackstone over his claim that Dissenters could not be loyal citizens and that holding Dissenting worship was a criminal.  He also continued to conduct scientific investigations, modeling the practicality of his friend Franklin.  In 1772 he published The History and Present State of Discoveries Relating to Vision, Light and Colours (known usually as Optics) was poorly received and the cost of his research put Priestley, who was receiving dwindling support, in financial difficulties.  Directions for Impregnating Water with Fixed Air was a pamphlet on how to make soda water, an innovation that he did not personally exploit but which soon made J. J. Schweppe a fortune.  Franklin and others persuaded a rising Whig star, Lord Shellburn to hire him as a tutor for his children and companion/advisor to himself.  Priestley and his family left his unhappy Leeds pulpit for Bowood House, where he had plenty of time to dedicate himself to the experiments that led to the isolation of oxygen.  He also had time to write on philosophical and metaphysical topics.  He published several pamphlets denying a mind-body duality and maintaining that materialism and determinism could be reconciled with a belief in God.  Priestley supported Lindsey’s decision to form a new denomination in 1774.  He attended Lindsey’s London chapel when he was in the city and occasionally preached there himself.  His written defense of scathing attacks on Lindsey, Letter to a Layman, on the Subject of the Rev. Mr. Lindsey's Proposal for a Reformed English Church earned him a claim to be a co-founder of English Unitarianism.  In 1779 Priestley relationship with Shellburn ruptured, either because the Earl’s new wife could not get along with Mary Priestley or, more likely, because Shellburn was becoming worried about being associated with his ever more controversial tutor.  In 1782 Earl Shellburn would become Prime Minister on a policy of peace and reconciliation with the United States.  Priestley decided to return to active ministry, accepting a pulpit in Birmingham.  He happily took a part in the local, progressive Lunar Society, a sort of philosophical club, and continued to both experiment and publish in addition to his clerical duties.  He spent much of the decade fruitlessly defending the Phlogiston Theory and disputing Lavoisier’s new chemistry.  Despite this blind spot, he continued to be productive and conducted experiments that eventually lead John Dalton and Thomas Graham to formulate the kinetic theory of gases.  But through the decade he was increasingly involved in theological controversies that became enmeshed in fears of the excess of the French Revolution.  An History of Early Opinions concerning Jesus Christ, compiled from Original Writers, proving that the Christian Church was at first Unitarian scandalized the nation as did bold claims that Reformation had failed utterly to reform the Church and harsh language that equated the growth of Unitarianism to laying grains of gun powder “…under the old building of error and superstition, which a single spark may hereafter inflame, so as to produce an instantaneous explosion…”  That kind of inflammatory language put off previous Whig supporters of loosening restrictions on Dissenting worship, including William Pitt (the Younger) and Edmund Burke.  When they voted against reform in Parliament, Priestly responded with scathing pamphlets of “Letters” to each man.  Burke, in particular, leveled all of his considerable rhetorical skills back against Priestley, Unitarians, and even science itself.  Priestley, however would not be deterred and only stepped up his support for the French Revolution.  In July 1792 a mob which historians now believe was abetted by local authorities and encourage, sub rosa, by the Crown, attacked a dinner in commemoration of the Storming of the Bastile that had been organized by Priestley and his friends.  At the last minute Priestly had been warned of the danger and stayed away.  The mob rampaged for three days and burned both Priestley’s chapel and his home which  contained his laboratory, an irreplaceable library, and scientific notes.  The family lost all of their possessions and were forced into hiding for several days until they could be spirited away to safety in London.  For three years Priestley lived in Hackney, Middlesex where wealthy Dissenters contributed to the family’s upkeep and Priestley served a local chapel.  He campaigned unsuccessfully for government recompense for his losses and continued defiantly to issue controversial pamphlets, including one blasting the Birmingham mob.  Around the country he was burned in effigy along with Thomas Paine and political cartoons regularly attacked him.  Friends in high places, including his associates at the Royal Academy, began disassociating himself.  When he was elected, without his knowledge or permission, to the French National Convention from three separate constituencies, his situation became untenable.  The Priestley family departed for America a scant 5 weeks before “radicals” were swept up on the order of William Pitt to be subjected to trials for treason.  Had Priestley not left, he would surely have been arrested.  The family arrived in New York in 1794 and were entertained and celebrated by Republican Clubs who regarded him as a hero and reviled by Federalists who saw him as a dangerous revolutionary.  Priestley, however, was determined to avoid partisan controversy in his new country.  He was welcomed to Philadelphia by Dr. Benjamin Rush who arranged for him to preach at the city’s Universalist Church.  Later he helped establish the continent’s first explicitly Unitarian congregation in the city, although he turned down the invitation to fill the pulpit.  Instead the family moved to rural Northumberland, Pennsylvania.  There Priestley quietly mourned the death of one son and his beloved wife.  He set up a laboratory and continued experiments, but was hampered by not being able to get the latest scientific information from war torn Europe.  He endured the published attacks of Federalist pamphleteer William Cobbett who sought to discredit Priestley’s friend Thomas Jefferson by attacking him as an agent of the French Revolution.  Despite it, Jefferson stood by Priestley, and consulted with him on establishing the University of Virginia.  Priestley also established an academy for local youths in his home.  He enjoyed the support of the American Philosophical Association.  After Jefferson’s election to the Presidency. Priestley congratulated him and confessed, “it is now only that I can say I see nothing to fear from the hand of power, the government under which I live being for the first time truly favourable to me” in the dedication of his final theological work, General History of the Christian Church.  He did not enjoy it for long.  Priestley fell ill in 1801 and never fully recovered.  He died February 6, 1804 at the age of 71.


  • Leave a comment
  • Add to Memories
  • Share this!
  • Link

Today’s Almanac—July 30, 2010

  • Jul. 30th, 2010 at 9:00 AM
formal portrait

 

The crest of Cold War and Anti-Communist hysteria may have passed by July 30, 1956, but there was still plenty of residual energy.  President Dwight D. Eisenhower, perhaps somewhat reluctantly, signed a bill that designated the words “In God We Trust” as the official Motto of the United States.  The year before Congress had acted to require that the phrase be put on all coins and bills.  Of course the U.S. had a defacto motto which had long been included on coins and currency—E Pluribus Unim, usually translated “out of many, one.”  That phrase was approved in 1792 for the Great Seal of the United States.  It did not satisfy fervid religionists.  Indeed the Great Seal itself, which was filled with Masonic and Deist symbolism without a hint Christian piety, had been a bone of contention since the first struggles over the proper role of religion in the Republic.  The largely Deistic founders had purposefully omitted any referenced to God in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights was silent on the subject except to prohibit Congress from the “establishment” of any religion or interfering with the religious observances of its citizens.  Practical men with a knowledge of history, they were concerned lest a favored religion or a defined heresy create civil discord and perhaps civil war.  Washington and Jefferson occasionally invoked a vague Deity, most often referred to Providence, Nature’s God, or sometimes the God of Creation, all common Deist constructions for an original moving force of the Universe.  They avoided terms like the Lord God which invoked the patriarchal deity of the Old Testament and never invoked Jesus Christ.  John Adams, a true product of the Puritan tradition as it evolved eventually into Unitarianism, firmly believed that organized religion was necessary to constrain the “passions” of an innately sinful humanity.  Moreover he was politically indebted to the support of the Black Legion—the clergy of the New England Standing Order—against “atheistic” Jeffersonian Republicanism.  Yet even he resisted considerable pressure to inject explicitly Christian prayer, practice, and symbolism into official use.  A complex battle between the evolving movement of Evangelical Protestantism and republican secularism see-sawed back and forth for the first decades of the nation’s existence.  Some compromises were unofficially reached, but on the whole the government remained resolutely secular, nor were Presidents even expected to make personal religious declarations.  During the crisis of the Civil War, however, President Abraham Lincoln needed the fervent support of the Protestant clergy, particularly its avidly abolitionist voices.  Not a personally “saved” Christian, and deeply influenced by the Founder’s secular Deism, Lincoln non-the-less was a student of the Bible as literature and was adept at echoing its cadences and invoking powerful Biblical language in his speeches.  But he was always being pressed by the clergy to make more overt religious statements.  It was in this context that Lincoln called for national days of fasting and Thanksgiving.  He also undoubtedly approved when his Treasury Secretary, the devout Salmon P. Chase, first directed the Mint to inscribe the words “In Good We Trust” on a two cent coin issued in 1864.  The approbation of the preachers far outweighed the slight protests of Freethinkers and over the next decades most—but not all—coins added the phrase as they were re-designed.  Government issued Greenback currency, however, contained no religious declaration, just a practical promise to pay the bearer in specie upon demand.  And so the situation stayed until the dawn of the Cold War.  Then Catholics, who had long been reluctant to join with Protestants in any religious demands on the government because they assumed, quite rightly that the Protestants would insist on narrow language that excluded Catholic worship,  became particularly alarmed at the rise of “atheistic Communism” and the suppression of Catholic worship in the new Soviet Satellites in Eastern Europe.  Leading anti-Communist Prelates launched a campaign to require “In God We Trust” on currency as well as all coins and to make it an official motto.  Federal authorities, who were eager to use those same Bishops to influence the heavily Catholic industrial working class against “Communist infiltration” of the labor movement, were more than glad to add religious arrows to their crusade against Reds.  When leading Protestant Evangelicals fell into line, the movement in Congress became irresistible even to those who were squeamish.  What Congressman wanted to be painted as voting against God?  Controversy over the motto and its use on currency and coins has never gone away.  Church and state separation advocates, civil libertarians, and atheist activists have repeatedly challenged the motto and its use on coins and currency in court.  And just as routinely have lost.  In the case of Aronow v. United States in 1970, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled, “It is quite obvious that the national motto and the slogan on coinage and currency ‘In God We Trust’ has nothing whatsoever to do with the establishment of religion. Its use is of patriotic or ceremonial character and bears no true resemblance to a governmental sponsorship of a religious exercise.”  The Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal.  In another case The Supreme Court upheld the motto in because it has “lost through rote repetition any significant religious content.”  With public support of continued use of the motto on coins and currency standing at 90% in a 2003 Gallup Poll it does not appear that the phrase will be going away any time soon.

 


  • 1 comment
  • Leave a comment
  • Add to Memories
  • Share this!
  • Link

Today’s Almanac—July 29, 2010

  • Jul. 29th, 2010 at 7:18 AM
formal portrait

 

On July 29, 1869 American novelist and dramatist Booth Tarkington was born into a comfortable, upper middle class family in Indianapolis, Indiana.  His long and very productive career was marked by his close examination of those 19th Century Middle Western roots in the humorous, nostalgic vein of his popular Penrod novels and Seventeen, as well as more serious depictions as in The Magnificent Ambersons and Alice Adams.  At first educated in Indianapolis schools, his socially ambitious family had him transferred to Phillips Exeter Academy, the fashionable eastern boarding school that was a conduit to the Ivy League.  But his family lost some of their wealth in the Panic of 1879, and young Booth was sent instead to Indiana’s own Purdue University.  A gifted enough student not to have to work hard for decent grades, he was popular on campus and enjoyed his two years there.  With improving fortunes he was sent to Princeton to finish his education.  There he joined a theatrical group where he excelled as an actor and first turned his hand as a playwright.  He became one of the charter members when the drama club was re-chartered as The Triangle Club, which continues to this day producing original work by students.  He also belonged to the Ivy Club, the oldest and most prestigious of Princeton’s dining clubs and also edited the Nassau Literary Magazine.  Voted the most popular student of the class of 1893, Tarkington failed to graduate, missing credit in one class.  However, he kept close ties to both of his colleges and made significant gifts to each when he became a wealthy and successful writer.  A residence hall at Purdue was named for him after he underwrote its construction and both schools awarded him honorary degrees.  In fact, he was the only person ever to receive two honorary degrees from Princeton, a measure of his literary prestige in the first quarter of the 20th Century.  Upon leaving school, Tarkington was able to undertake the traditional grand tour of Europe and spent time in such upper-class enclaves as Kennebunkport, Maine between extended stays in Indianapolis.  He began successfully  writing short stories for popular magazines.  In 1900 he had success with his second book, Monsieur Beaucaire.  Uncharacteristic of most of his work the slender novel was a comic historical romance 18th Century England.  It’s themes of social class and caste, however would be reflected in more American scenes.  The book went on to be a successful play, was made into an operetta, and was twice filmed, in 1924 with Rudolph Valentino and 1946 with Bob Hope.  Tarkington married in 1902 and set up primary residence in Indianapolis. The marriage, which produced one daughter, ended in divorce in 1911 and Tarkington married Susanah Keifer Robinson the following year.  In 1902, the year of his first marriage, Tarkington was elected to a single term as a Republican in the Indiana legislature, which gave him fodder for his book In the Arena: Stories of Political Life published in 1905.  Tarkington was soon publishing nearly a book a year in addition to a volume of poetry and plays, including adaptations of his books.  Later he would also do screenplays from his work.  Penrod, the first of a series of books about the adventures of a small town boy of comfortable circumstances, began as magazine stories and was published in 1914 and was widely popular.  The next year Tarkington finished The Turmoil,  the first book of the Growth trilogy about the fall of an old wealth family and the rise of the industrial new rich.  The second book of that series, The Magnificent Ambersons was published in 1918 and is considered by most critics as him most important work.  It won the Pulitzer Prize in 1919.  Orson Wells famously made it into a classic film in 1941.  In between, in 1916 came Seventeen, a much beloved, painfully comic tale of a young man’s unrequited love.  It is still an entertaining and enjoyable read.  In 1922 Tarkington won a second Pulitzer Prize for Alice Adams, his tale of a vivacious small town girl of modest means who plots to snag the handsome son of the town’s leading wealthy family.  It, too, was twice made into a film adapted for the screen most famously in 1935 by my distant kinswoman Jane Murfin for Katherine Hepburn.  Presenting Lily Mars, published in 1933 told the story of a stage struck young woman and incorporated themes from Tarkington’s lifelong interest in the theater.  It was made into a MGM musical staring Judy Garland in 1943. In the early ‘20’s Tarkington began to lose his sight and was blind by mid-decade.  He continued to produce a steady stream of novels, plays, and non-fiction by dictation up to his death in 1946.  In all nine of his novels were top best sellers and several of his stage plays long running hits.  His reputation as a novelist has been eclipsed by harder edged work by later American writers.  Seventeen remains perennially in print as a juvenile favorite, but Tarkington is now best remembered for the films made of his work.


  • Leave a comment
  • Add to Memories
  • Share this!
  • Link

Today’s Almanac—July 28, 2010

  • Jul. 28th, 2010 at 12:29 PM
formal portrait

 

Army Chief of Staff Douglas MacArthur conferring with his cavalry commander, Major George S. Patton on Pennsylvania Avenue during the action against the Bonus Marchers,  The officer with back to the camera and hands on hips is MacArthur’s aide, Major Dwight Eisenhower.

On July 28, 1932 Washington, D.C. became a battle zone when President Herbert Hoover ordered the Army to “clear out” veterans, their families and supporters who had been camped since June pressing demands for an early payment of a bonus promised to World War I soldiers.  It was nearly four years into the Great Depression with no relief from an almost total economic collapse in sight.  True unemployment was estimated to be nearing 25% with no safety net other than voluntary soup kitchens.  Tens of thousands of small businesses had failed dropping once solid citizens into poverty.  Farm income had collapsed.  Across the board, conditions were bleak.  Veterans of the Great War were still relatively young men, most in their late 20s to early 30s.  They had been welcomed home as heroes.  Despite the inevitable post-traumatic stresses of any war’s aftermath, most had married and were raising families when disaster struck.  Largely able bodied and well disciplined, they were perhaps the most employable men in America.  But many, very many, were in desperate shape that summer.  In 1924 under pressure from veterans’ organizations, especially the American Legion, Congress had passed Adjusted Service Certificate Law over the strenuous objections of President Calvin Coolidge.   3,662,374 bonus certificates were issued to veterans, the face amount determined by a formula of how many days each soldier served in the U.S. with a greater payment for each day overseas.  The maximum amount due was $500 for domestic service and $650 payable when the certificates matured in twenty years—1945.  Although veterans were allowed to borrow against a percentage of that sum—eventually raised to 50%, the money had to be repaid with interest.  Congress financed the scheme with annual appropriations of more than $12 million to fund the 1945 payments which were expected to be more than $3.5 billion.  Loans paid out against the certificates had already placed the fund in the red.  None the less, in face of the dire emergency leading figures like popular retired Marine Corps General Smedley Buttler began advocating for an immediate early payment of the bonus certificates.  Democratic Congressman Wright Patman of Texas, then in the second term of his long career, introduced a bill to authorize the payments.  It was ardently opposed by the President and Republicans in Congress.  Hoover, a Quaker, had risen politically largely on his reputations as The Great Humanitarian for his work feeding starving European civilians in the wake of the war.  He was the only engineer until Jimmy Carter, to be elected President, a man of meticulous attention to detail, a deep attachment to Republican laissez faire economic philosophy, and a practically physical revulsion at “disorder.”  He had responded to the Depression with cheerleading, rosy predictions for recovery, expressed sympathy for those affected but a firm belief that they were on their own and that the Federal Government had no Constitutional responsibility to them.  More concerned with the holy writ of a balance budget, he urged spending be slashed—a policy that not only did not help but actually deepened the Depression.  Naturally he and the unified Republicans railed against the proposed Patman Act as a budget buster. The Bonus Expeditionary Force was organized by Walter W. Waters, a former sergeant in the AEF—American Expeditionary Force—in World War I, to descend in mass on Washington to pressure Congress to pass the Patman Act.  Veterans and their families from all over the country, but mostly from the East, responded to the call arriving in the city on June 17 as the Senate took up the bill, which had already cleared the House.  Senate Republicans blocked action on the bill and the Bonus Marchers settled into makeshift camps, nick named Hoovervilles.  Although the shabby camps were assembled from what tents could be obtained and junk scavenged from scrap yards, the veteran leaders exercised military discipline.  They were laid out in orderly streets, sanitation facilities were dug and maintained, common kitchens established, and camps patrolled by volunteer M.P.s.  Men had to register producing evidence of honorable discharge to be admitted and were each expected to do duty keeping the camps clean, orderly and secure.  The men responded to daily revelry and held regular parades.  American flags were prominent. The veterans were very concerned that the public see them as loyal patriots.  And by in large, despite being denounced as dangerous Communists in the most conservative press, the public was at least sympathetic to them.  Over 17,000 men enrolled. Their wives and children plus some approved volunteer supporters—especially nurses and medical personnel swelled the camps to a total population of over 40,000.  The main camp was laid out on the mud flats and boggy ground by the Anacostia River across from the core of the city.  Marchers gathered daily for orderly demonstrations near the Capital.  By late July it was evident that the Republicans in the Senate would not budge and that the Patman Act was doomed.  Acting on direction of the President Attorney General William D. Mitchell ordered District Police to “evacuate the city” of bonus marchers on the morning of July 28.  Veteran leaders were taken by surprise by a police charge and the men resisted.  Ill trained police responded by emptying their revolvers into the crowd killing two men outright and injuring dozens.  Enraged, the veterans fought back, pelting police with rocks, bricks and anything else they could lay their hands on.  A few may have had handguns and fired back or fired with weapons taken from disarmed officers.  Police were forced to withdraw with nearly 70 men injured.  The veterans remained on Pennsylvania Avenue.  Learning of the failure of the police, Hoover ordered the Army to take action.  Army Chief of Staff Douglas MacArthur, in dress uniform and festooned with every decoration he ever received, decided to take personal command.  As commander of the famed Rainbow Division made up of National Guard units, many of the veterans in the streets had served under him.  MacArthur employed two full regiments, the 12th Infantry, and the 3rd Cavalry, supported by six battle tanks commanded by Maj. George S. Patton.  The Army arrived on the scene about 4:30 as Federal employees were leaving their offices.  MacArthur, with his aide Major Dwight Eisenhower at his side, ordered his troops to advance.  At first many of the veterans were glad to see their brother soldiers.  Some believed that they had arrived to protect them from the police, other said they thought the advance at first was a parade in their honor.  Then Patton ordered his cavalry to charge, sabers drawn.  As the horrified witnesses from surrounding office buildings screamed “Shame, Shame!” the cavalry crashed into the thick mass of veterans.  As the veteranss reeled back, the infantry came up with bayonets fixed and using adamsite gas, an arsenic based gas inducing violent vomiting, to clear the camps.  Women, children, and civilian volunteers alike were swept up.  Against the President’s explicit order, MacArthur crossed the Anacostia into the vast main camp.  Tents and huts were put to the torch, destroying all of the personal positions of the veterans and their families.  Survivors, including many injured, were scattered into the country side where local law enforcement personnel hectored them for days as they tried to find ways to get home.  In the end at least four veterans, including two of their leaders, William Hushka and Eric Carlson were killed and an estimated 1,017 injured.  Most historians agree that both of those figures are low because the injured were either unable to get medical treatment or afraid to seek it.  In addition one woman suffered a miscarriage and an infant was killed.  Again historians, believe, based on eye witness accounts, that other children, especially infants were killed or died later as result of the gas.  Within a week newsreel footage of the attack was being played in every movie theater in the country.  Public outrage played a big part in the defeat of Hoover for re-election that November.  But if veterans thought that Franklin D. Roosevelt would support payment of the Bonus, they were wrong.  Roosevelt wanted to use money for other projects and direct relief.  But F.D.R. was not about to make the same mistake as Hoover when a smaller Bonus Army appeared in the summer of 1933.  Instead to sending in the Army, he sent Eleanor, who brought tea to the veterans and urged them to instead enlist in the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC).  Hundreds took her up on the proposal and were put to work building the causeway road to Key West, Florida.  When the September 2, 1935 Labor Day hurricane, killed 258 veterans working on the Highway, public sentiment again swung behind the veterans’ demand.  In 1936 Congress over-rode Roosevelt’s veto to finally authorize the early payment of the promised bonus.  After World War II the G.I. Bill with its promises of immediate money for education or a home purchase was enacted specifically in response to the plight of World War I vets. The 1963  March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom called by Martin Luther King, Jr. and his allies was inspired by the Bonus Marchers.  His 1968 plans for the Poor People’s Campaign, which included a camp of protesters, was even more evocative.  The Campaign, conducted after King’s murder, was not dispersed by troops.


  • 1 comment
  • Leave a comment
  • Add to Memories
  • Share this!
  • Link

Today’s Almanac--July 27, 2010--Part I

  • Jul. 27th, 2010 at 11:21 AM
formal portrait

 

It’s Two-fer-Tuesday

 

On July 28, 1866 permanent telegraphic connection between North America and Europe was established when a new trans-Atlantic Cable was completed. It was the fifth attempt to make the connection.  The first, in 1857 and failed.  The second attempt in 1858 did establish a connection.  Queen Victoria wired her congratulations to American President James Buchannan.  Despite this engineering  triumph for the company launched and guided by Cyrus West Field, the new cable failed within a month when excessive voltage was applied while to achieve faster telegraph operation.  A second attempt that year to lay a replacement also failed.  Although the brief operation proved the project was feasible, the great expense and technical challenges—and the intervening crisis of the American Civil War—delayed further attempts until 1865.  By that year successful underwater cables in the Mediterranean and elsewhere led to the development of an enduring and well insulated cable.  According to Wikipedia the new cable:

 

The core consisted of seven twisted strands of very pure copper weighing 300 lb per nautical mile (73 kg/km), coated with Chatterton's compound, then covered with four layers of gutta-percha, alternating with four thin layers of the compound cementing the whole, and bringing the weight of the insulator to 400 lb/nmi (98 kg/km). This core was covered with hemp saturated in a preservative solution, and on the hemp were spirally wound eighteen single wires of soft steel, each covered with fine strands of manila yarn steeped in the preservative. The weight of the new cable was 35.75 long hundredweight (4000 lb) per nautical mile (980 kg/km), or nearly twice the weight of the old.

 

In 1865 S.S.Great Eastern captained by Sir James Anderson began laying the improved cable heading west from Foilhommerum Bay, Valentia Island, in western Ireland.  After 1,062 miles the cable snapped and the end was lost to the bottom of the sea.  Anderson had to return to Britain and Field had to scramble to raise new capital for another attempt the following year.  He formed the Anglo-American Telegraph Company, to lay a new cable and complete the broken one and sold enough stock to try again in 1866.  This time the Great Eastern completed its task bringing the cable to its western terminus at Heart's Content in eastern Newfoundland.  Displaying its usefulness the first message from the continent in addition to praise from The Times contained word that a peace had been signed between warring Prussia and Austria.  After a few days in port, Anderson turned the Great Eastern back to sea to try and locate the lost end of the 1855 cable and restore it to operation.  It was an epic search conducted by dragging a grappling hook over the sea bed a mile and a half below.  The cable was snagged and lost once before it was finally recovered and spliced to new cable in the ship’s hold.  On September 7the ship returned to Heart’s Content and two cable connections were soon functioning.  When the Transcontinental telegraph between California and the America East was completed on one end and Russian telegraphy stretched to the Pacific, much of the world was connected.  And London was the hub of world communications. Messages over the vast distance were not instantaneous.  Only eight words in a minute in Morse Code could move and took several minutes to cross the ocean.  None the less, connection was made and valuable information—especially commercial news and stock quotations, were quickly going back and forth.  In the next few years seven other cables laid by companies from Britain, the U.S., France, and Germany.  By the 1870’s improved technology allowed duplex and quadruplex transmission and receiving systems to relay multiple messages over the cable.  It was literally possible to have “conversation” with questions and answers across the ocean in hours. 


  • Leave a comment
  • Add to Memories
  • Share this!
  • Link

Today’s Almanac--July 27, 2010--Part II

  • Jul. 27th, 2010 at 11:13 AM
formal portrait



On July 27, 1940 Billboard magazine began it’s chart of best selling single records.  It subsequently added charts on radio play frequency and juke box plays in an attempt to assess the overall popularity of any recording.  Although Billboard gave the charts equal weight, the record store sales were most highly valued by the industry.  Records across all genres were recorded on the same chart, and radio stations using it as a guide tended to play the variety of top sellers, exposing wide audiences to different styles and sounds.  The first 1# hit on the new chart was I’ll Never Smile Again by the Tommy Dorsey Orchestra with a vocal by Frank Sinatra.  It stayed on top for twelve weeks.  On August 4, 1958, Billboard premiered one main all-genre singles chart, the Hot 100 which combined sales and air play and which became increasingly the “Bible of the Industry”.  The first song on the Hot 100 was Poor Little Fool by Ricky Nelson.  The Hot 100 is still issued, although criteria have changed with the evolution of the recording industry.  The FM radio revolution beginning in the late 1960’s ushered in an era of increasingly specialized broadcasting with play lists tightly bound to particular genre causing the downfall of AM cross genre hit radio.  Many album cuts, though enormously popular and receiving heavy air play were not counted on the singles-only chart.  But album sales eventually swamped singles, which began to virtually disappear with the beginning of the eight-track and later cassette tape era.  To accommodate these changes on December 5, 1998 the Hot 100 changed from being a singles chart to a songs chart.  The era of music downloading effectively killed the remaining singles market as it was known by the turn of the 21st Century.  Since February 12, 2005, the Hot 100 tracks paid digital downloads.  Controversies about the gathering of data and about recording industry attempts to manipulate it are constant, but the list remains the best evidence of over-all popularity of a song.   Over the air radio, satellite radio, and internet broadcasting has continued the trend of becoming more specialized and literally dozens of charts track everything from European techno-pop to traditional folk sales.  Few listeners get the chance to sample broadly across genres anymore.  As of today Love The Way You Lie by Eminem featuring Rihanna sits atop the Hot 100.


  • Leave a comment
  • Add to Memories
  • Share this!
  • Link

Today’s Almanac—July 26, 2010

  • Jul. 27th, 2010 at 2:16 AM
formal portrait


Most people remember George Bernard Shaw as an old man.  Here he is about the age of 40 when he had his first success as a writer.

On July 26, 1856 the only man ever to win a Nobel Prize and an Academy AwardAl Gore doesn’t count because his movie won the Oscar, but he personally did not—was born in Dublin, Ireland to a minor civil servant and an aspiring singer.  George Bernard Shaw was also a major influence on my young life when I was cast as Alfred E. Doolittle—was type cast in blow hard character parts—in a high school production of Pygmalion.   Just as a role in Inherit the Wind led me to the treasure trove of Clarence Darrow, American radicalism, and the labor movement, this role introduced me to the wonders of Shavian wit and wisdom and to socialism.  For several months, until actual factory employment started me down the road that would lead to the direct action radical labor movement of the IWW, I bemused and confounded friends with declarations that what America needed was a Fabian Socialist movement to make socialism palatable to the middle classes.   My infatuation with Fabianism may have been brief, my fascination with Shaw genius was not.  Not that I am an expert in all things Shaw.  I have read his best known plays, some of his socialist screeds, and some of his essays, but that just skims the surface of the prodigious production of words that when issued in a uniform set of complete works took  36 volumes and twenty years to produce before the playwright’s death in 1950.  Shaw got an indifferent education in Protestant schools in Dublin because he rebelled against the mind numbing crushing of creativity of rote learning and especially against the physically abusive culture of repeated discipline by caning.  After his mother abandoned the family to pursue her dreams of a singing career in London taking his sisters with her, Shaw stayed in Dublin with his alcoholic father. Dropping out he became an estate agent—managing the affairs of landowner—for a few years.  To pursue his dreams of improving his education by personal application, he joined his mother and sisters in 1876.  They subsidized him to the tune of a Pound Sterling a week as he educated himself in the reading rooms of the British Museum.  He earned his meager keep by ghost writing a music criticism column for his mother’s voice teacher, Vandeleur Lee.  That eventually launched him on his first successful career as a critic of the arts.  Meanwhile he tried his hand as a novelist, completing five manuscripts over the next five years, none accepted by a publisher.  After he became famous the novels were each published over a period of several years and none of them were very good, although the later ones previewed his moral vision and taste for the didactic.  But he was learning a craft.  In 1885 he finally became a self-supporting writer when he was hired as a reviewer fashionable Pall Mall Gazette writing first under pen name Corno di Bassetto (Basset Horn) and later simply under the initials GBS.  He also published occasional pieces in other journals.  As a critic, Shaw was disgusted by what he considered the vapid conventions of the popular stage which catered to a self-congratulatory ruling class.  He became one of the first great English language champions of the new realistic drama of great Norwegian playwright Henrik Ibsen, whose work shocked Victorian sensibilities.   His extended essay Quintessence of Ibsenism published in 1891 was a major breakthrough both for the critic and for Ibsen in the English speaking world.  In 1895 he became the lead drama critic of the Saturday Review publishing under his full name.  His columns, written in a lively, accessible style enchanted a public used to a dry, self-serious style of commentary.  Shaw, at age 40 was just starting to make his mark.  Meanwhile Shaw’s social and political views had taken a radical turn when he became an early and ardent member of the Fabian Society, named in honor of the Roman general Quintus Fabius Maximus  who advocated tactics of harassment and attrition rather than head-on battles against the Hannibal.  In practice the society rejected violent revolution, urged adoption of a simple life style—including vegetarianism—and used written persuasion to enlist the middling classes in support of the workers.  With leading spirits Sidney and Beatrice Webb, Shaw was soon one of the Society’s leading polemicists.  He authored several pamphlets, many gathered into Fabian Essays in Socialism, published in 1881.  Shaw became a dedicated vegetarian, anti-vivisectionist, and rejected much of modern medicine—including vaccination—advocating a healthy diet, simple life, and excersize.  He tended to be more pacifistic than other Fabians, many of whom explicitly embraced the Empire and believed that adoption of a cooperative commonwealth in Britain would thus further its spread around the world.  The Fabians were influential founders of the British Labor Party in 1906, and many of their proposed social reforms became the heart of the Party platform.  Mirroring his relationship with his mother, Shaw’s relationships with women were complicated.  On one hand he adored them and on many occasions wrote about his conviction that they were in every way possible the “moral superiors” of men.  He conducted protracted, passionate relationships by letter with actress Mrs. Patrick Campbell and others, but is never known to have consummated a relationship.  In 1898 he married Anglo-Irish fellow Fabian and feminist Charlotte Payne-Townshend. The couple were devoted to each other and remained together until her death in 1943 despite their mutual vow of abstinence.  For most of their marriage they lived in a rural village of Ayot St Lawrence, Herefordshire at the house that became famous as Shaw’s Corners while maintaining a London flat.  In 1885 Shaw’s friend and mentor, the critic William Archer, suggested that he not just complain about the theater as he found it, but that he should teach by example.  Together the two men began collaboration on a play based on an outline by Archer.  The project floundered and Archer withdrew.  Years later Shaw completed the play on his own as Widowers' Houses, a scathing attack on slumlords which was first produced in 1892.  Shaw was never satisfied with it, but work on it convinced him that he had found his medium.  Over the next twenty years he would enter into a period of enormous productivity and creativity and write some of the most enduring plays in English.  All cast as comedies, they tackled the deepest issues of society in a witty, approachable way.  They were definitely talking plays—long monologues expounded themes and back and forth banter sharpened them.  The topics of many of the plays were so controversial that they first met with success in production on the Continent or America before they were accepted by British audiences.  The Devil’s Disciple (1897) set during the American Revolution and sharply critical of Imperialism, was a hit on Broadway before London.  Other plays, roughly in order of their production, of enduring appeal and still frequently performed were:  Mrs. Warren's Profession (1893),  Arms and the Man (1894), Candida (1894),  Caesar and Cleopatra (1898), Man and Superman (1902–03), John Bull’s Other Island (1904), Major Barbara (1905), The Doctor's Dilemma (1906), The Dark Lady of the Sonnets (1910), Androcles and the Lion (1912), and Pygmalion (1912–13) which was destined to become his most famous and beloved play.  Not only were these works successful on the stage, but unlike most scripts, became avidly read by the general public.  Shaw produced three collections of plays and others were issued individually in this era.  Many had long, elaborate prefaces that were as popular as the plays themselves.  The bloody mayhem of World War I was a discouraging shock to Shaw and a disappointment.  His beloved socialist movement had failed world wide to prevent the conflict.  Militant workers became jingoistic patriots over night and willing cannon fodder.  He had to revise many of the sunny expectations of Fabian socialism.  Shaw grew to believe that the working class was so abased by its dominance by Capitalists and the social elite that they were incapable of taking effective electoral or other political action on their own behalf.  After the Bolshevik revolution, he reluctantly concluded that revolution and the true transformation of society had to be placed in the hands of benign supermen, who would be selectively bread by wise women selecting worthy mates.  These leaders would be able to take action on behalf of the disempowered working class.  Shaw embraced a kind of eugenics in pursuit of the goal.  These ideas were explored in his most important post war plays.  Back to Methuselah (1921) was an epic consisting of 5 one act plays covering the history of humanity from the age of Genesis into the future.  In 1924, with his reputation in Britain at a low ebb after a string of less distinguished plays and public anger at his war time pacifism lingering, Shaw had St. Joan premiered in New York.  Coming shortly after the Catholic Church’s canonization of the Maid of Orleans, Shaw spent considerable time researching trial documents and other evidence available at the time.  He found that everyone concerned from the peasant to her accusers and inquisitors were were acting in good faith according to their beliefs.  A critic called it a tragedy without villains.  Shaw had anticipated Hannah Arendt and “the banality of evil.”  The play was an international sensation and was the immediate cause for the playwright’s selection for the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1925.  Shaw, who did not believe in honors, was first inclined to turn down the award but his wife convinced him to accept because it would reflect well on Ireland, the homeland he had abandoned 50 years earlier.  He did refuse the money prize and directed that it be used to “translate good Swedish book into English.”  After St. Joan few of Shaw’s plays were memorable, although some met with initial success on the stage.  He often attracted more attention as a social commentator and as a recognizable international celebrity with his trademark 19th Century white whiskers, old fashion tweed suites, and innumerable eccentricities.   In 1938 Leslie Howard prevailed upon Shaw to undertake the screen play for Pygmalion, which became an enormous international hit staring Howard and Wendy Hiller as Eliza Doolittle.  He was awarded the 1938 Academy Award for Best Adapted Screenplay.  Later, Alan J. Lerner used the film script as the basis for his libretto adaption,  My Fair Lady.  Through the ‘30’ Shaw’s political opinions were drifting more and more authoritarian. He had an early infatuation with Mussolini until it became clear that the Italian had abandoned his early socialism.  After a visit to the Soviet Union in the early ‘30’s where he met and appreciated Josef Stalin, he even endorsed “humane” elimination of those “useless to society.”  In 1938, with the world on the cusp of war, Shaw published an essay,  Dictators—Let Us Have More of Them.  Shaw’s authoritarianism and favoring of eugenics—although Shaw’s version of eugenics was opposed to “selection” on racial or anti-Semitic grounds—have left many modern writers and critics bitterly critical of him and sometimes dismissive of his whole body of work.  Shaw did not make himself popular in Britain by maintaining his pacifism in World War II and likewise earned the bitter enmity of former Communist admirers for not supporting the Soviet Union when it was under attack.  He congratulated Eamonn de Valera and the Irish Free State for resisting Britain’s threats against neutral nations.  But just as the first Great War changed his opinions, so did the second.  Shaw was not above admitting his mistakes.  In 1944 he published a rambling reassessment of socialism and his own views, Everybody's Political What's What which regretted the excesses of what would later be called Stalinism and called for a replacement of simple 19th Century socialism with scientific humanism.   It was very nearly a swan song for the old man.  There would be one more full length play, not very well written or received.  In 1949 Shaw penned a twenty minute puppet play, Shakes versus Shav, a kind of intellectual Punch and Judy Show with Shaw and Shakespeare as the combatants.  The next year he was dead following complications after a fall in his garden at the age of 94.  As requested there was no religious service nor was there any use of a “torture device”—the Cross allowed.  He had directed that his ashes be mixed with those of his wife and that they be scattered together around the statue of St. Joan in the garden at Shaw’s Corners.  After his death a spate of revivals of his classic work in Britain, Canada, and the United States revived his tarnished reputation.  Today he is second only to the Bard himself in the number of his plays still regularly in production around the word.  The Old Man evidently still has something to say to us. 

 

  • Leave a comment
  • Add to Memories
  • Share this!
  • Link

Today’s Almanac—July 25, 2010

  • Jul. 25th, 2010 at 6:37 AM
formal portrait

 

Blucher the little colliery engine considered the first modern steam locomotive.

On July 25, 1814 George Stephenson put his first Steam locomotive, a small engine for use hauling coal on the Killingworth Wagonway in England near his home and workshop.  He called the noisy little contraption Blucher after Prussian general Gebhard Leberecht von Blücher who had helped the Duke of Wellington whip Napoleon.  It could haul 30 tons of coal up a hill at 4 mph and was the first successful flanged-wheel adhesion locomotive—gaining traction only from the wheel turning against the rail and not from a cog or other system.  Steam had been applied to moving coal as early as 1804 by Richard Trevithick  at a colliery at nearby Tyneside and several other engines were built by various men for mines in the Newcastle area.  But none worked so well, so reliably, and so safely—boiler explosions were common—as did Stephenson’s.  The Blücher is now considered the first truly modern steam locomotive and Stephenson the father of an industry.  Stephenson was born on June 9, 1781 at Wylam, Northumberland.  His father was a fireman on a steam pumping engine in a local colliery and his son entered the mines in the same capacity at the age 17.  Although he had no formal education, he took to the mechanics of the crude engines and began to study at night to improve his condition.  He worked at various capacities in the mines, married, had children, and was left a widower.  When he repaired a broken engine at Killingsworth in 1811 he was promoted to enginewright and was soon repairing—and improving—pump and winch engines for several pits in the area.  After the successful introduction of the Blucher, Stephenson is believed to have completed 16 other engines of various design.  Not all worked.  At least two had to be withdrawn from service because of defects.  But with every experiment and every engine built, Stephenson learned.  His new engines were to heavy to operate on traditional wooden rails, attached strips of iron were not durable, and solid cast iron rails were too brittle.  So Stephenson improved the cast iron rails and went to the practice of multiple wheels to better distribute the engines’ weight.  In 1820 be built an 8 mile long railway from Hetton colliery to Sunderland.  Gravity was used on the down slope, but the steam engine provided power on the level and upgrade.  It was the first longer railroad employing no animal power at all.  In 1825 he was hired by Edward Pease to construct the 25 mile long Stockton and Darlington Railway to bring coal from the mines for market.  Pease also joined in forming the company of Robert Stephenson and Company to manufacture new, more powerful engines for the railroad.  The company built four engines, Locomotion, Hope, Diligence, and Black Diamond.  On September 25, 1825 the new line opened with Locomotion hauling 80 tons of coal and a specially built car for dignitaries, Experiment, the first ever built specifically for passengers.  The dignitaries found themselves hurtling along at an astonishing of 24 miles per hour in one stretch.  The road was built with wrought iron rails with a track gage of 4 feet 8½ inches, which became the standard in the British Empire, the United States, and most of the world. Stephenson was soon also at work laying out the new Liverpool and Manchester Railway, the first to connect major cities at some distance and to contemplate regular passenger service.  He employed now accepted techniques like using grading, cut backs and trestles to keep the road bed as level as possible, and crossing a bog by literally “floating” the track—something of an engineering marvel.  But he was not assured the contract to build locomotives for the line.  Instead the railroad directors announced a completion.  Stephenson’s entry was Rocket, largely designed by his son Robert and the first to use the recent French innovation of a fire tube boiler.  The trial required engines to run 60 miles and weigh no more than 6 tons.  Rocket easily won the competition and Stephenson was a famous man overnight.  The railroad opened on September 30, 1830 with a raft of dignitaries led by the Duke of Wellington on hand.  A parade of trains powered Stephenson built engines left Liverpool with open passenger cars.  The engines included Northumbrian driven by George Stephenson, Phoenix driven by Robert, North Star driven by his brother Robert and Rocket.  The day was somewhat marred when a member of Parliament foolishly dashed in front of Rocket and was crushed to death.   Stephenson went on to a lauded and distinguished career both as a civil engineer laying out new lines and as the manufacturer of ever more powerful and efficient engines.  His son Robert and others contributed to the success of the company.  The first engines used commercially in America were built at Stephenson’s shops and American designers learned their craft there.  Stephenson died on August 12, 1848 at his home in Chesterfield, Derbyshire a wealthy and honored man.  But despite his contributions to British wealth and power, because of his humble origins he was never extended a Knighthood.


  • Leave a comment
  • Add to Memories
  • Share this!
  • Link

Today’s Almanac—July 24, 2010

  • Jul. 24th, 2010 at 6:55 AM
formal portrait

 

Cheyenne Frontier Days was a well established 13 years old when former President Theodore Roosevelt visited in 1910.  That’s T.R. standing at the top of the stairs to the platform in front of the packed grandstands.

Today will mark the start of rodeo competition at the 114th annual Cheyenne Frontier Days.  Known as The Daddy of ‘em All, it is both the longest continuously held cowboy competition in the world and by far the largest outdoor competition of its kind. Although there has been a National Finals Rodeo since 1956 to crown individual champions in each main professional rodeo event, that indoor event, currently held in Las Vegas, lacks the pageantry and history that make Frontier Days unique.  The first Cheyenne Frontier Day was a one day competition for local cowboys working the big ranches in the area on September 27, 1897.  The event included a cowboy parade through downtown.  Cheyenne was a bustling and modern small city, not only the Wyoming state capital, but home to major Union Pacific Railroad facilities.  Its streets were the first in the nation to be illuminated by electric arc lamps back in 1883.   Fueled by the cattle barons on Millionaire’s Row, the city considered itself up-to-date and cosmopolitan.  Even in 1896, however, just six years after statehood and four years since the bloody events of the Johnson County War, residents were becoming nostalgic for their wild west heritage.  The first event was so successful that Frontier Day became an annual event.  The competition was soon being promoted nationally by the Union Pacific to boost tourist traffic on its trains, and the local business community loved the sound of cash registers ringing at local hotels, restaurants, bars and brothels.  By the turn of the 20th Century elements of the popular wild west shows popularized by Buffalo Bill Cody and others, including mock hold-ups of the Cheyenne to Deadwood stage coach, Indian battles, and in particularly bad taste given recent history, re-enacted lynching of “rustlers” were incorporated into pageantry surrounding the rodeo.  Other events like street dances, amateur theatrics, menageries, and carnivals were added to the ever growing event over the years as more days of competition were added to the rodeo. Cowgirl competitions were an early favorite. The cowgirls rode the same stock and took the same risks as the men but were judged separately. In 1910 former President Theodore Roosevelt was delighted to be on hand to congratulate the winning rider.  In 1903 as sitting president he had visited and a special one day rodeo was staged in his honor and he participated in a ride over Sherman Hill from Cheyenne to Laramie with Senator Francis E. Warren and big-wigs of the Wyoming Stock Growers Association.   By the 1930’s stars of Hollywood’s popular westerns, including the state’s own favorite son Col. Tim McCoy, were regularly making personal appearances and sometimes incorporating the rodeo itself into their films.  Concerts by popular Hillbilly and Cowboy singers—and later the masters of Western Swing were added to the mix.  Since 1931 reigning over the event has been Miss Frontier and her court.  For the first three years the winner of the honor was selected on the basis of who could sell the most tickets to a dance.  Starting in 1934 the Frontier Committee has privately picked Miss Frontier and her two attendants, traditionally drawing on the daughters and granddaughters of local cattle barons or Cheyenne business leaders.  One requirement was that she had to be an expert horse woman.  Miss Frontier of 1936 was Mary Helen Warren Wolborn, granddaughter of the state’s founding patriarch Francis E. Warren.  She designed and the distinctive white buckskin culottes costume worn to this day.  Her inspiration was a costume worn by celebrated fan dancer Sally Rand who had titillated audiences the year before.  The 1950’s were the Golden Age of Rodeo.  The most storied figures of the sport were active—Casey Tibbs, Big Jim Shoulders, the Bell Brothers, and the legendary rodeo clown and bulldogger Wilbur Plaugher—and  shined in Cheyenne.  Monte Blue, known for playing the sheriff in countless B westerns, was the arena announcer famous for his signature call at the beginning of each rodeo, “Let’s go, let’s show, let’s rodeo!”  Chief Charley Red Cloud and Princes Blue Water, who had appeared with Buffalo Bill, brought their band of Oglala Sioux each year to perform traditional dancing and live in a teepee village on the grounds of Frontier Park.  Top movie and TV stars from Roy Rogers to Hugh O’Brian made personal appearances and country music stars like Ernest Tubbs, Red Folley, and the Sons of the Pioneers performed nightly at the Frontier Pavillion. From 1954 through 1956 my father, W. M. Murfin as Secretary of the Frontier Committee, played a leading roll in coordinating the rodeo and all of the other activities.  My brother Tim and I (see my profile picture for confirmation) reveled in riding in the parades and meeting the cowboys and celebrities that often came through our house.  Today the whole Frontier Days extravaganza stretches over ten days and includes 9 rodeos sanctioned by the Professional Rodeo Cowboys Association (PRCA).  Day Money is awarded to the winners in each event for each rodeo.  At the end of the schedule Cheyenne Frontier Days champions are named in each event and an All Around Cowboy, who has to compete in two or more events, are determined by the total amount of Day Money earned. There are also two nights of separate Professional Bull Riders (PBR) competitions. More than 2,500 local volunteers work on events that include the rodeo, parades, pancake breakfasts, concerts, chili and chuck wagon cook-offs, the carnival, exhibits, Indian Village, military open houses and performances by the United States Air Force Thunderbirds.  This year in addition to top Country Music acts like Brooks and Dunn and Alan Jackson, the decidedly non-country Kiss kicked off the concerts.  I know many readers of this blog are animal lovers and abhor rodeo and the people who love it.  No question about it, rodeo can be brutal to both animals and human competitors—bull riding is hands down the most dangerous competitive sport in the world.  It remains so even though significant reforms have been made in how rodeo stock is handled and particularly dangerous events for animals like the Chuck Wagon Races—think horse drawn NASCAR with often horrific pile-ups—and Steer busting—roping a steer around the horns then pulling past the animal catching its feet and throwing it to the ground, a maneuver that often resulted on broken necks or legs—have been eliminated.  Nothing short of abolition by law of all rodeo competition will satisfy many animal rights folks.  I understand that.  But I also love a good rodeo.  I guess you will have to lump me with the heartless brutes. 


  • Leave a comment
  • Add to Memories
  • Share this!
  • Link

Today’s Almanac—July 23, 2010

  • Jul. 23rd, 2010 at 6:58 AM
formal portrait

 

The 1869 Cincinnati Red Stockings, baseball’s first all professional team in an illustration from Harper’s Weekly.  Team Captain Harry Wright sporting the muttonchops is seated second from the left.

On July 23, 1866 the Cincinnati Baseball Club was formed at a meeting in an office in the bustling riverfront city.  Among those involved were lawyer Alfred T. Goshorn who drew up the founding documents and was elected club President and George B. Ellard, president of the well established Union Cricket Club.  Goshorn would go on to head up the Centennial Exposition in Philadelphia ten years later and Ellard’s connections would be invaluable in developing a strong team.  The club was an example of the explosion of interest in the relatively new game of baseball beyond the clubs clustering around New York and the East Coast.  Historians of the game cite the Civil War, where soldiers from around the country often spent extended time battling boredom in camps between episodes of horrific violence.  Eastern players brought their bats and balls with them and introduced the game to eager participants from western regiments.  In the first year the all amateur club of local players were able to arrange only 4 matches and had to scramble to find fields to play on.  For the 1877 season the club joined the National Association of Base Ball Players (NABBP), which included members of most of the established Eastern clubs.  They also reached an agreement with the Union Cricket Club to hold matches at its already developed pitch.  Plans were made to add bleacher seating and build “a more substantial wall” around the playing field.  These improvement were financed by charging 10 cents admission to the public—members of either of the competing clubs were admitted free—and  25 cents for “foreign matches,” those booked by other teams looking for a hard to find playing field.  This innovative business model served the club well. Crowds did come and plunk down their hard earned cash to see the new game being played.  Several experienced athletes from the Cricket club, including their English club pro Harry Wright also joined the club team.  Wright acted as what would later be called the manager and pitched.  His salary continued to be paid by the Cricket club, circumventing rules against professionals.  This is an example of how quickly the English game was supplanted in public affection by the American upstart.  In 1867 the first team romped to sixteen victories against regional teams but was humiliated by a loss to the Washington Nationals that was a wakeup call about the different level of play in the East where organized teams had been competing—and developing talent—for years.  The  1868 team was very different.  Gone were half of the local players on the starting nine.  In their place were experienced ballplayers from the East including John Hatfield and Fred Waterman from the New York Mutuals, Asa Brainard a pitcher from the Brooklyn Excelsiors, and catcher Doug Allison Geary Club of Philadelphia.  These allegedly amateur players did not come to Cincinnati for the climate.  It was obvious to everyone that they were lured there with the promise of some kind of remuneration, such as no-work jobs at supportive local businesses.   Cincinnati was not the only team engaged in these ruses.  The Mutals and other top eastern teams were stealing from each other’s rosters.  Cincinnati was just doing it on a larger scale.  And it paid off.  In the 1868 played a heavy schedule of 43 games and lost only 7.  Again they dominated their regional rivals, but were able to split games against Eastern teams on a late season tour.  Over the next winter the NABBP bowed to reality and changed rules to allow teams to hire professionals.  They did so on the assumption that clubs would mix a few pros with local amateurs, but they set no limits.  Wright took advantage of that loophole and announced a wholly professional team of players paid cash money for an eight month season.  Wright shifted from pitching to the outfield, from where he became the captain of the defense and his younger brother  George Wright joined the team as shortstop and was on his way to becoming the dominant player of the era.  The team also adopted a new style of uniform which included a white flannel shirt emblazoned with a large Gothic capital C on the front, short white trousers with bright red stockings reaching nearly the knee, and floppy white caps.  The short pants and stockings were a never-before-seen innovation and quickly earned the team the nick name Red Stockings.  Their first game on May 4 against another local team the Great Westerns was a 43-9 romp.  It set the tone for a fabulously successful season.  The Red Stockings won 57 games and tied one against other teams in the NABBP and played over 70 games in all.  Their extended season included a long barnstorming tour that took them from Boston and New York all the way to San Fransisco.  The final game of the season at home at the Cricket grounds was a satisfying 17 to 8 drubbing of the Mutuals.  The team riveted the attention of the national press with publications like Harpers Weekly breathlessly covering team exploits and publishing engravings of players and the team.  Everywhere they went the professional Red Stockings spread their new, aggressive style of baseball and their snappy uniform style was copied by the wanna-be teams they played.  The same professional roster returned for the 1870 season and met continuing success.  The schedule of games was lighter as regional amateur teams were no longer eager to match themselves against the powerhouse.  That meant a dramatic fall of in revenue from home games.  Despite going 27-6 in NABBP games and finishing second over-all, the club was in financial trouble.  The club’s board voted over the winter not to employ a full 9 professionals in 1871 and cut salary offers to those it tried to keep.  The pros bolted.  A new National Association of strictly professional clubs was formed that year, which would become the first true baseball league.  The Wright brothers and half the team went to Boston where they signed with a new Association club which adopted their red stockings and nick name.  Other players went to Washington, but that franchise folded mid-season.  The new Boston Red Stockings dominated Association play from the first year.  In 1872 they were joined by some of their former team mates who had gone to Washingtion.  Together they won four of the Association's 5 championships.  When the new National League was founded, the Boston club became a charter member and continued its winning ways.  The Boston team went through other nicknames, including the Beantowners before becoming the Braves in 1912 after years of dwelling in the National League cellar.  The upstart—and much more successful—American League franchise swooped in and adopted the Red Sox nickname in 1907.  The Braves would go on to migrate to Milwaukee and eventually Atlanta where they can claim the oldest pedigree in baseball stretching back to the Cincinnati club.  They still wear a touch of red on their uniforms, including red stirrup socks.  Back in the Ohio city, a new club in the National League adopted the name Red Stockings in 1876 but was expelled in 1890 for refusing to stop selling beer at games and renting its field out to other teams on Sundays.  In 1882 a third club took the name, an entry in the new American Association.  The club was a dominate force in the new league through 1890 when it jumped  along with the Brooklyn club, to the National League that year.  The NL entry changed its nickname to a shortened Reds and spent most of the next twenty years scavenging near the bottom of the rankings.  In the McCarthy Era owners banished the name Reds and renamed the team the Redlegs, which met fan resistance and was finally abandoned with the passing of the Red Scare. The team eventually went on to better things including the dominance of the Big Red Machine in the late ‘60’s and early ‘70’s.  Today’s team likes to hint at connection to those first pioneer pros, but the only thing they have in common is the city—and that bright red hosiery.


  • Leave a comment
  • Add to Memories
  • Share this!
  • Link

Profile

formal portrait
[info]patrickmurfin
patrickmurfin

Tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Sponsored by Cisco